this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
32 points (94.4% liked)

Canada

10027 readers
1219 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Three former Toronto mayors are expressing their opposition to changing the name of one of the city’s most well-known streets.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What a waste of time. Who cares about the name of a street. People focus so much time, energy, and money (not to mention public time energy and money) on things that don't matter when we have real issues that need to be dealt with, and quickly.

How about getting some of the current transit projects fixed up so that they actually finish during our lifetimes? Or fix the housing crisis? Or deal with all the empty office space? This city has countless problems, many from neglect over the decades, and people think that changing the name of a damn street is more important.

People need an ego check.

[–] cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problems you listed are hard, but like painting a bike shed, everyone has an opinion on changing the street name.

[–] Dearche@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

They are hard, but hard problems are the ones that need addressing. Easy problems tend to have little to no effect, regardless of if they're solved or not. And solving this problem will have exactly zero impact beyond stroking a few egos (which is something I consider a bad thing so thus should be avoided).

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Love how this is how my tax dollars are being used.

Not working towards solutions for actual problems, but instead how to re-label a street name.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Remember when the city of Berlin, in an effort to disassociate itself from the horrors seen in Germany, changed its name to Kitchener – after Lord Kitchener, inventor of concentration camps...?

Looking forward to seeing what bad things the new name is associated with.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Link for anyone interested in learning about Kitchener's atrocious behaviour. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War_concentration_camps

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Baby steps.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Normally we give friends of the council a lot more! This is a good deal." – Toronto city council, probably.

[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Spend that 8.6m on homeless shelters instead. Or fixing pot holes.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Who the fuck cares? What a waste of taxpayer money.

[–] EhForumUser@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Melanie Newton, the co-chair of the city council advisory committee looking at the renaming issue, has studied Dundas’s legacy and said that as Britain was weighing abolition, he intervened and introduced a motion for ‘gradual abolition.’

In other words, the government of the time was mixed about abolition, and instead of letting it die on the floor to those who were opposed, he proposed a gradual system to try and win more abolition support – to ensure that something happened instead of the otherwise certainty of nothing?

What a horrible monster. Get that name changed at once!

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, much as I agree that there's a good reason for this, it's really not the best optics to do this right now, and I really do wonder if the reason it's even being floated is a) to get people to engage on a frivolous issue instead of real ones, and/or b) for the media to generate rage-clicks.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Rename it. That'll show ...

Well, I'm not sure. Sticks and stones, I guess.