If I were you, I'd stop trying to explain one thing that I'm struggling to explain using the other thing I'm struggling to explain as an analogy.
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
34 points (81.5% liked)
Fediverse
44010 readers
204 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
But they are similar problems and I assumed the overall problem is very familiar to people around here
Ok, let me try again. I think people forget the mental shift that it takes to join a federated network. And I think you cannot convey that in a simple analogy. People are so used to a central power behind their social media that they don't even understand the concept of having a social network with no one defining the rules. Its simply not part of their world view. And to open them up for this kind of mindset is hard.
I don't think that this is entirely true. Every instance has admins, communities have admins and moderators too. They define and enforce rules, make decisions and perform maintenance. It's not that different from centralized platforms with the exception that there's no common higher authority.
I'd use something that people are already familiar with: emails are the most common example. But maybe people could imagine a world, where users on Facebook could see posts and interact with people from Twitter and vice versa. Platforms are different, owners are different, but people in this hypothetical scenario could communicate with each other. That's much more relevant to modern world than emails and probably not that hard to imagine.
Fediverse is like that, but you can also pay $5 for a server and start your own Facebook.
Imagine a bunch of separate web forums each with their own management and policies. We have all used those. Now imagine that they are loosely connected to each other behind the scenes, so you can cross-post between them, if the admins are willing. That's not too hard to understand, imho.
There is occasional minor drama when there are cultural differences between two forums (say a leftwing vs a rightwing political forum) and the admins get upset and start interfering with the backend connectivity (defederating other instances) because they don't like what members of the other forum are saying. That drama is not an attractive feature of the fediverse, but rather the opposite. Anyway, I hope that helps.
If somone tried to convice me with anime to join the fediverse, I'd never join...
Then you watched the wrong anime ;)
Replace anime with DC cartoons.
"There's this thing called the fediverse. To understand it, watch this episode of Batman. Go ahead, I'll wait."
See what the parent poster means?
I think the only answer here is that we need Japan to create "Hikaru no Lemmy", where an ancient spirit of a dead Lemmy poster possesses a young boy called Hikaru, who proceeds to amaze the world with some top tier Lemmy posts 😛
Or more seriously, I'm a huge fan of this infographic and share it with people whenever I get asked about Lemmy: https://i.imgur.com/b2QuYAR.png
Good one indeed!
Ha ha, good one :D The graphic is also good. I wish there would be one in like a medieval fantasy setting. On the left side you have a mad king who tries to control the whole empire, on the right you have federated states, each with their own community and rules. I think these graphics are great but I wish we would make more use of storytelling: for example, someone growing up in the centralised fantasy kingdom, who then joins federated tribes living in the wild. I think that could also be done with just a few slides.
One would make sure that it doesn't get too political though ...
I usually explain it simply:
"Do you use email?" "Yeh" "It works similar doesn't matter which provider you choose Proton, G-mail, Yahoo and your mail can go to all of the others."
I tell people it's like signing up for a newsletter with your email, except the newsletter is also your social media feed.
Right and that explains it well. But it doesn't exactly get people excited or make them understand what it FEELS like to be part of a federated social network.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I honestly don’t get what there is to say. Anyone trying to tell me about the dramas of any social network, be it the Fediverse, Twitter, Pinterest or Facebook will have an uphill battle.
The content itself can be interesting, but the platform itself rarely is.
Good point. But with decentral social media you have to take part in this stuff at least to some degree. Or you are on a very solid instance. Better then to prepare people about this stuff too.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Good point
I don't see the drama. I've been on Usenet, Reddit, single sited forums etc. for a long time, and now Lemmy. Lemmy is actually underwhelming for now, though hopefully it will keep expanding.
Federation itself is no big deal. In fact it's annoying because you can't easily search across the entire fediverse with a single query, the way you can search Reddit. Plus the burbles we get over defederation tell me that federation (as currently implemented) is a misfeature. There should be cleaner separation of back ends (instances) and clients (web UI's and local apps), and federation should happen in the client. That way you can view any instances and communities you want to in a single interface, instead of leaving it up to server admins.
It's a network of social media, all using the same protocols, and each tends to have some focus: Canada, Australia, art, communism, and large numbers of members, for example.
I didn't find federated social media to he hard to understand after the first hour or so. Is that weird?
Well, there is drama, like in any human community, it's just that this community has half a million computer nerds.
It's a bunch of people that have been leading the technological revolution of the past decades, all experimenting with something called the Fediverse.
While everything is new and there are a lot of changes, some things are more common than others.
- Privacy matters.
- Freedom of speech matters.
- The internet should be built by the people, and for the people, not big corps.
PS Not everyone here is a computer nerd, though that's something to take pride in IMO, but most of us kinda area.
The best way to get people to be interested in something is to tell them they can't. Be a hipster. Tell them Fediverse is cool but they don't know anything about it.
I think this is a neat idea! How to make it work though…
From my perspective, the fediverse is mostly about pioneering. Venturing to new places where the others (twitter, reddit) have been for years and were established. We‘re still fighting trolls and stans from time to time but far less than on the reddit side.
There is corporate disobedience as we walk away from the known, the enshittified and the boring to brave places where new people might spit in our face or name you their bff.
I mean, the fediverse is really as if someone had hacked twitter, sold the code to 100 people and now they all spin up connected clones. Same with reddit. Benefit: one clone goes down and the service still exists.
If you need more inspiration i‘d suggest asking chat gpt. :)
I don't think it has more or less drama compared to other social networks, I think it's more so that it's just easier to pick up on drama that normally gets lost throughout all the noise on bigger platforms. r/subredditdrama and r/drama are GIANT and really difficult to keep up with. There reaches a point where all the drama on a social media site it just blends into all the noise most of the time unless it affects the entire site. It takes alot to truly fuck shit up, like poor business decisions (ahem...) or major inter community strife.
Alongside that in comparison to centralized social media, if an instance is a hot bed for drama and toxicity? It might be time to move to a different one.