this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
99 points (93.8% liked)

Linux

48031 readers
1075 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shots fired by Oracle. I trust them about as much as I have a chance of sailing with Larry Ellison (also, ever notice how he looks like a Bond villain?), but I could see their arguments swaying at least a few folks who are looking for a corporate-backed enterprise distro that has the resources and incentive to keep up. Maybe at some point some of their SRPMs even end up assisting Rocky or Alma.

It’s a sad day when Oracle in word and deed is being more friendly to the community than Red Hat (“We do not have subscription agreements that interfere with a subscriber’s rights to redistribute Oracle Linux”).

Edit: Fixed link

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds a lot like the pot calling the kettle black. Oracle is nothing but a bunch of stark hypocrites. They have absolutely nothing to say on the subject matter of FOSS and open and fair competition. This is just peak corporatism. Oracle is the king of proprietary. They've done NOTHING to contribute to open source. They take, take, take!

[–] negativenull@negativenull.com 34 points 1 year ago

Not only do they do nothing for open source, they actively kill open source projects after aquiring them.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Anyone with any experience with Oracle hates Oracle.

Fuck them and the horse they rode in on.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oracle saying to keep Linux free is like an arsonist talking about fire safety (after they burned your house down). The fact that they can say that shit with a straight face is shameful. What a fucking world we've found ourselves in.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago

"The hen house simply must be left open," says local fox, after rival fox got hired to guard hen house

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Nice try Oracle, it's not like we forgot all the shit you've pulled though.

[–] nan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

lmao, OK Oracle...

[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finally, to IBM, here’s a big idea for you. You say that you don’t want to pay all those RHEL developers? Here’s how you can save money: just pull from us. Become a downstream distributor of Oracle Linux. We will happily take on the burden.

Oh shit, Oracle and IBM are going to duke it out. Where is my popcorn?

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

IBM just doesn’t care, corpos are still going to use RHEL just the same tomorrow as they did yesterday. Oracle is in the position to throw shade simply because they don’t have market share with Oracle Linux to toe-to-toe with RHEL. If they did, they wouldn’t be giving away a free lunch.

[–] MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

So much talk, nothing to back it up. Blatant PR move.

[–] Laser@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

For Oracle, the position makes sense. They want to commoditize around their own stack / products, which is enterprise software. They profit from a free operating system below that. So while I'd say this statement is more than just PR, it can be dismissed as it isn't honest. I'll believe it when they open source their core products (like Oracle DB) and allow rebuilds. Until then, they can go fuck themselves

[–] Marxine@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The trend of one shitty corporation attempting some PR bullshit and market-taking after the previous shitty corporation makes a really idiotic move doesn't stop with Meta going for Twitter's throat, doesn't it?

Oracle trying to spin up some moral high ground over RedHat is hysterically bad. They'd do better staying quiet.

[–] mhz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Very persuading coming from a company where half its employees are lawyers.

load more comments
view more: next ›