this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
185 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
186 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta's new text-based social app Threads has quickly gained 100 million users since launching last week, which appears to be negatively impacting traffic on Twitter. According to web analytics, Twitter traffic declined 5-11% over the first two days Threads was available compared to the previous week. Threads was able to grow rapidly by allowing users to sign up with their existing Instagram accounts and bring over some of their followers. However, Threads has not yet launched in Europe due to regulatory issues. The fast growth of Threads may solidify its position as a real competitor to Twitter, which has over 238 million daily active users.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] esty@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://9to5google.com/2023/07/10/threads-readies-handy-explainer-of-mastodon-and-the-fediverse/

When you limit replies, your thread will not be shared with your fediverse followers.

Private profiles will be able to follow an interact with people on other platforms at a later date.

Like clockwork

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

How is this controversial? If someone locked down replied / set profile as private they have clearly communicated their intent to limit exposure of their posts. It only makes sense to limit such users from interacting with other servers which Meta has no control over. There are lots of compliance issues for a company like Meta when they have to operate in multiple jurisdictions.

[–] Delusion6903@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

what is this private vs public profile? I don't know the difference.

[–] kelvinjps@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe those are mostly Instagram accounts?

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 year ago

@kelvinjps
@trashhalo Yes, it is. Each Insta account automatically now seems to have a Meta account. And visa versa, it's a scam. You can't delete your Meta's Threads account, unless you delete your Instagram.

[–] Feanor@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

https://mastodon.social/@taylorlorenz/110693385561252959 Elon really made some metric up to claim twitter is healthy

[–] drilly@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried out Threads just to see what the fuss was about. It's mostly just annoying celebrities.

[–] fuser@quex.cc 1 points 1 year ago

It exists to provide the illusion of competition.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 1 year ago

@trashhalo Nice, they can remove their API limit again? hahahha. Just kidding, Twitter is ded anyway.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 9 points 1 year ago

Is this considered masochism? This seems like masochism.

[–] bumblychicken@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now if only my feed can only show the accounts I'm actually following

[–] mrnomoniker@lemmy.studio 7 points 1 year ago

What’s profitable about that? Just a thing that’s useful and relevant to your interests?

[–] StantonVitales@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Well I guess that's at least one good thing about Threads

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Linking these to instagram accounts is textbook anti-trust behavior to establish market positions

Not a goddamn thing about this is 'organic'

[–] MaxPower@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads has not yet launched in Europe due to regulatory issues

LOL no, there are no "regulatory issues". Meta itself expects Threads to be illegal in the EU. Which is probably correct. And they do not seem to be having a problem with it. Which is fine by me.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Threads has not launched in Europe because it breaks European laws. Yet 100M people jumped straight on it.

load more comments
view more: next ›