this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023

-32 points (25.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35467 readers

506 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.

Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...

2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...

3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...

4. No Porn/Explicit

Content

-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...

5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts

-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...

6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

7. Content should match the theme of this community.

-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...

8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.

-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

LillianVS@lemmy.world

STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

-32

All I wanted was a simple search. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is ridiculous. It's taken me a long time to switch to DuckDuckGo because when I get comfortable with something, it's really difficult for me to switch, but if they're going to totally change it (even if it appears to only be for certain search terms now), this is the last straw.

To make it worse, this is a re-search. The first time I searched the term, it asked me if I wanted an AI definition at the top of the page.

No, I want a fucking Wikipedia link. I realize it's on the page, but come on.

This is the same search on DuckDuckGo:

top 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] eating3645@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly do not see what you're upset about, both search engines look like they did well here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hate all the unnecessary clutter. It's needless. It wasn't that way once.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I hate all the unnecessary clutter.

FYI, I use an adblocker to strategically remove annoying elements of a page (most will have a "click to remove" feature). You can probably do the same in whatever search you use, but I find it particularly useful on sites like Amazon or news sites.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats just how it is. You hate unnecessary clutter. So use duckduckgo. And google users may not want to open wikipedia they might simply want the single sentence defenition shown.

Also there is nothing infuriating about this

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LOL, please subscribe to /c/ obscure and specific pet peeves that an odd human has confused with universal annoyances @ wtf.lemmy.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 1 year ago

Same. That's why I run my own with Searx-NG. It sends your queries out to several (DDG, Google, Bing, and more) and aggregates the results to you. No extra crap, no bs, just what you searched for.

[–] onelikeandidie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although I think duckduckgo did a better job, I still don't understand what is infuriating about this one. Google Search just wants to priorize showing you an excerpt from what you are looking for in case you are looking for a definition.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

What infuriates me is how ridiculously and needlessly cluttered it is.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

No, that looks effective to me. If you had to scroll through two pages of 20 minute videos of in-depth reflection on eternal September, I might be with you.

If you just wanted to see Wikipedia, go there and type it instead of Google.

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These results seem pretty much the same to me?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

It's the clutter I hate.

[–] Cinnamon3431@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

if you want to go straight to wikipedia just go "!w eternal september"

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't look like AI generated at all. They quoted Wiktionary to give the definition right at the top. Helpful

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I didn't say it was AI generated, I said they asked if I wanted an AI definition.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I want a fucking Wikipedia link.

Add "Wikipedia" to your search term, then.

It's worth noting that Wikipedia has recently gotten down-ranked in Google's search results. It's rare to be the first result anymore, so just add that to your search terms.

Or, alternatively, just go to Wikipedia and search directly on there. Remove the middleman if you already know what your final destination is going to be.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Google doesn't want to to leave Google. Putting Wikipedia at the top encouraged people to click away

So Google is now trying to deincentivize using the service they're providing.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

it's literally a giant link on the right-side knowledge panel. Plus the purpose of a search engine is for you to go to other sites, why wouldn't it encourage people to click away if they don't have it

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't even see how this is "cluttered". Do the two extra images really make that much of a difference to you? Plus isn't Wikipedia always a link in the right side's knowledge panel?

[–] wieli99@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If it were the other way around, the narrative would be that google wastes space...

[–] PrunesMakeYouPoop@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God forbid I Google for information about anything that may be a product for sale, because all I'll get is shopping links. It's super annoying.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Try searching something like "best longboards," and you'll get lost in an ocean of potential deathtraps from Amazon Affiliate blogs. I wish there was an extension to filter out all Amazon Affiliate links from any page. They're an absolute plague

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Startpage

Inetol's SearXNG

I'm not sure if this helps, but these are the two search engines I use most often.

[–] Whayle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this! SearXNG is great, and took just a few minutes to spin up the Docker container.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Startpage gives better results than DDG and without clutter.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

There is a bit of clutter with the "related searches." I always find that super unhelpful, and I wish there were a setting to disable it.

It's still superior to both examples posted by OP, though.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stopped using them when they started asking for a fucking captcha every few searches for VPN users.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use mullvad all the time, I see the captcha only a few times a week, if at all.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe they toned it down a bit, but they've already lost me.

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

This seems to be one of the rare times these days that google actually does a pretty good job getting you the result you seek for without clutter and ads.

Also, use bangs to search on a specific site. If I want to search for an article on Wikipedia, I just type in "w ". d for DuckDuckGo, g for Google, b for Bing etc. I default to Brave primarily and DuckDuckGo secondarily.

[–] Senex@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

FYI Duckduckgo has a lite version. Bare bones. Just search results. lite.duckduckgo.com

[–] illectrility@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Qwant's lite version is better imo. Just as fast but much more functional

[–] Senex@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware Qwant had a lite version. Cool!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nice. Thanks!

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Blank white background. Eww.