Privacy

31914 readers

574 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Which apps began to interoperate with FB Messenger? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 7 months ago by PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta has already announced interopability opportunity since March 6. Has anything been made after that? All I know is that Signal apparently won't operate with them.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They didn't open anything really. All they did was to allow companies to interact with their client API in an extremely limited fashion and only after signing an NDA riddled contract.

Its no wonder there are no takers on this "offer" and I hope the EU fines them billions for this malicious compliance.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, they have 6 more months to finish this still. EU granted them more time to finish this API because they filled for extension and provided them reasons why. All other DMA clauses regarding messenger other than interoperability are not included in this extension

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

Hmm, I was indeed going by their WhatsApp api access, but I doubt FB Messenger will be substantially different after 6 months.

[–] bluegandalf@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Has there been official communication from Signal that they won't?

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

yes.

https://www.heise.de/news/Whatsapp-muss-sich-oeffnen-Threema-und-Signal-winken-ab-9636224.html

Signal does not want to lower its standards for WhatsApp either. "Our privacy bar is extremely high, and not only will we not lower it, we want to keep raising it," says Signal President Meredith Whittaker. "Currently, working with Facebook Messenger, iMessage, WhatsApp or even a Matrix service would mean a degradation of our privacy standards."

[Translated with DeepL]

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was curious about this too and had a little look myself, all I can find is that other companies interested in interopability are implementing MLS encryption instead of implementing the Signal protocol in their apps.

Can't find any info on Signal's blog about interest in adopting MLS encryption, or considering interopability with Meta apps that already use (or may use) the Signal protocol... unless I've missed something or been looking in the wrong place

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Messenger is implementing signal protocol for interoperability, you can read this in their blog post

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

My guess that they might only integrate WhatsApp and maybe instagram chat with their messenger. Makes sense that they will focus first on their apps.

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

Even if they do, I would run away from any service/app that would open to them. And so should everyone!