this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
449 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

48693 readers
1394 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 89 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

UX is a very subjective matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A

C

A

T

I

S

F

I

N

E

,

T

O

O

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 53 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bad news is that it is not clear at this point whether Mozilla is going to go forward with the implementation. A post on Reddit by one of the project members suggests that the build is a "rough proof-of-concept". Some features tested in the build "did not survive". It is unclear which did not, as they are not mentioned. Mozilla is, however, implementing those that survived the cut into Firefox. Again, the poster does not mention which those are. It is also not verified that the poster is actually a member of the project team, so take this with a grain of salt as well.

[–] Justly0250@lemdro.id 5 points 8 months ago

Isn't Firefox open source? So isn't it possible that anyone could see the changes being made even in the nightly versions? I'm not a programmer so forgive my ignorance.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 38 points 8 months ago (3 children)

i wish they'd include vertical tabs and oneline navbar in settings rather than making the users edit userchrome. userchrome is really fun but it'd be much more accessible if it was on settings.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 38 points 8 months ago (11 children)

I use Edge on my work computer since I can log into it with enterprise SSO and store my passwords and bookmarks to my work account. Not ideal, but I don't do anything personal on my work computer because I already have zero expectation of privacy on it anyway.

Vertical Tabs are an absolute game-changer, especially combined with tab groups. I can actually juggle hundreds of tabs in a single browser window without issue. It's the only thing I can say that Edge got right.

I've been waiting for this development for a long time. I can't wait to have this functionality on my personal computer, on a privacy-respecting FOSS browser no less. The extensions currently available for this are just not that great, it has to be a native feature.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ff with sidebery is pretty amazing. Although, it's annoying you need to add a CSS file to disable regular tabs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alright, now do bifurcating diagonal tabs.

[–] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Sinusoidal wave tabs are clearly the only way to tab.

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Never saw the appeal in vertical tabs, but maybe Edge or FF extensions just don't do them well enough... Good for Mozilla though, I guess

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 26 points 8 months ago (3 children)

For 16:9 (ish) displays you have more pixels left to right than up and down, it makes sense to use up your horizontal space first when placing permanent UI elements on your screen. Still up to preference though.

[–] hangukdise@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agree... Too much screen real estate horizontally, not enough vertically

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Especially with the gigantic tab buttons the browser uses by default even in "compact" mode.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Those screenshots look really nice, ngl, hoping this goes through. Edge and Vivaldi have had their own vertical tab implementations for a while now, and there are Firefox forks that show it can be done. No reason for base Firefox not to have it at this point.

While I'm here, Mozilla bring back compact spacing, plz k thx.

Edit: Just tried it, it's got that nightly jank but it's promising. I hope Mozilla continues with this. It looks and feels great.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 11 points 8 months ago

My goodness yes, having to enable it in developer settings every time so annoying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 8 months ago

Literally the only thing I wanted!! 💚

[–] imnotfromkaliningrad@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

congratulats to the people liking them i guess. i personally dont get it, since most languages are written horizontally and i like ux to reflect this structure. such things are subjective though

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The counterpoint is since 16:9 became the de facto standard for monitors, vertical resolution is at much more of a premium than horizontal resolution is.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 12 points 8 months ago

Not to mention that most sites will put their main content into a container with a limited width anyway, since overly long lines are awful to read. So unless you're using the browser side-by-side with other content on a low-res monitor it's a net benefit. And even if it's not I usually find the extra vertical space to be worth more, as you said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Onihikage@beehaw.org 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

since most languages are written horizontally and i like ux to reflect this structure. such things are subjective though

You might be misunderstanding what we mean by vertical tabs - we aren't literally turning the tabs sideways and putting them on the side of the browser. We're placing the tabs, still horizontal, into a stacked, scrollable list on the side of the browser. The superiority of this display method for tabs on widescreen displays is not subjective, and here's why:

  1. Tab titles are not typically very long, but there tend to be a lot of them. This data is far more readable and accessible as a bulleted list than a long paragraph.
  2. Beyond about ten to fifteen tabs, tabs displayed at the top, side by side, must either shrink and obscure the title, go off-screen and be invisible without scrolling, or stack in multiple rows across the top. A vertical tab setup can easily display 30-40 of them in a vertical list, all with the maximum visible amount of their titles which helps distinguish them from one another.
  3. Modern desktop screens are wider than they are high, but webpage content scrolls vertically, often leaving a lot of empty space on the sides.
  4. Eyestrain is reduced and readability improves when the width of the reading area is reduced. This is why text on the web almost never fills the full width of a widescreen display, why most books are taller than they are wide, and why newsprint articles have many narrow columns rather than filling the entire page.
  5. Given points 3 and 4, tabs at the top of the browser window on a widescreen display leave slightly less room for the actual page contents, while tabs displayed in a vertical list on one side only cut into the white space that exists on the sides of the content, while keeping the titles readable and causing less eyestrain.
  6. With one change, a list can become an outline with sections and headers, following your own train of thought as you branch out and expand on each idea. In the same way, tabs displayed as a list can be very easily displayed with a tree structure, allowing tabs to be grouped, collapsed, and generally organized in ways that are impossible for traditional-style top-tabs.

This is why Tree Style Tabs exists, though I prefer Sidebery these days, being more customizable and performant than TST. There's no way I can ever go back to top-tabs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Try out Tree Style Tabs for an hour. I'm curious how you'll feel about it.

[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I've been using TST for years and while it can be a bit buggy at times I couldn't imagine going back to the default tab system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flubba86@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you're missing what's going on. The text is still written left-to-right. You don't need to read the tabs vertically. The tabs are stacked on top of each other in the sidebar instead of lined up along the top of the window.

[–] Molten_Moron@lemmings.world 9 points 8 months ago

I believe their point is that their language is left to right, so it just makes sense to them to have the tabs structure left to right as well.

I happen to share this sentiment, but can understand why some people may like it different.

[–] GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My dream would for this to at least have an option for collapsable tree-style tabs. That's what I'm missing the most from the Edge implementation. Even "normal" vertical tabs struggle when you have over a hundred open tabs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CsXGF8uzUAOh6fqV@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I completely hid my tabs with custom css and I'll never go back. With something like vimium-c you can switch tabs with vim-like bindings and an fzf-like menu. If you have lots of tabs, the fzf way is way faster to pick out a specific tab than it is to look for it in a tab row (or column). If you have few tabs, you don't even need to see them to know where they are. I'm being very serious. Tabs are bloat. I recommend trying it out if it is something for you.

(edit) On top of that, it looks so clean. You get a bit more space for the actual content (I also hide my url bar, it pops up when you use it). It fits right in with a keyboard focus workflow, you get consistent keybindings across vim and your browser (I use the same keybinds for switching buffers in vim so it feels the same).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

anyone else feel like a lot of these firefox updates recently are just them implementing the most popular extensions from firefox 3.6?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

It's always been like this. Aside from Gecko and/or security updates that's how all browser development has functioned since add-ons became a thing.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I migrated from Edge for the last time to avoid Manifest v4, I’ve been missing vertical tabs a lot. Sidebery just didn’t work for me. I really like how this is looking.

[–] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Edge mentioned on this sub? Brave.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I would love the option of keeping containers in vertical tabs with "page tabs" horizontal. For example; Facebook, Personal, Banking, Work, Incognito, etc containers along the left as vertical tabs, and each one has all the pages in tabs across the top. Vertical tabs only appear after you open more than one type of container.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

I tried so hard to get used to vertical tabs, and failed miserably. I just can't like them. Lol

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And to round out this story, here’s a photo that we think evokes the concept of “vertical”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 8 months ago

Shit just got real

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I was just today trying FF again and discovered vertical tabs was via extension only and holy shit disabling the tabs up top looked like a bit of work. Native vertical tabs and grouping and I'm back. It should just copy the layout that Edge does.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

Yesss come on! I moved to Edge at my place of work because I can no longer see what I'm doing with horizontal tabs. And we can't use addons in Firefox.

This will land in ESR in three years time and then we'll be rolling...

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.run 6 points 8 months ago

Waterfox beating it to the punch lol

V E R T I C A L S U P R E M A C Y

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I just spent 3 days learning a basic level of css and messing around in my userchrome and NOW they decide to add it...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›