this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
64 points (86.4% liked)

[Dormant, please move to !television@lemm.ee] Movies and TV Shows

2720 readers
1 users here now

Please move to

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

644 would have been more secure.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know what I'd call this person, but I don't think it would be "film fan" if Thor 4 and Mario alone made up 10% of the movies seen.

Obsessive compulsive, maybe? Hyper competitive? Bit of both?

[–] livus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Came in to say this. That's not fandom it's something else.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

They were trying to set a record and this is like the least labor intensive way of setting a record.l

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How did they verify that the guy actually attended all those showings? As opposed to buying the ticket and not showing up

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago

Who would lie about seeing Thor: Love and Thunder 33 times?

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

According to Guinness, "he was monitored by cinema employees during each screening". In other words, Guinness didn't verify this record. Guinness records are more PR than actual records of human achievement, you'll find a surprising number of records either weren't verified by Guinesss or were paid-for records where Guinness came up with an idea unique or specific enough for you or your company to achieve without the bother of actually tracking the record.

This record does seem plausible at least, but you're right to take Guinness with a grain of salt.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The real question is, why would he watch "Thor: Love and Thunder" 33 times, when he could be watching the far superior "Barbie" instead?

But then again, the movie did came out late July 2023, which is right before the end of his record's time limit.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What streaming services is Barbie on? Is there a mattel+? (First question is serious btw)

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

What streaming services is Barbie on?

Max.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As per Guinness World Records, Swope saw an eye-watering 777 movies between July 2022 and July 2023, eclipsing the previous record of 715 movies held by France's Vincent Krohn.

Swope, who was raising awareness about autism, even caught multiple movies several times – including The Super Mario Bros. Movie 35 times and Thor: Love and Thunder 33 times.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and Thor: Love and Thunder 33 times.

That poor man.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Better than Mario, ugh

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was a Linux joke. But it's really out of place here.

[–] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is lemmy, Linux is always a potential topic.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Live long and prosper. 🖖

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's like $15,000-$20,000 dollars worth of movie tickets.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has Regal Unlimited, so it only cost him $22/month:

He prioritized short-length movies which allowed him to watch more in a day as he used a Regal Unlimited membership, which gives him access to every film for just $22 per month.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, so this whole thing is an ad for a movie theater subscription plan?

[–] spez_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's all?

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I think I saw like 2?

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, Greg Turkington has really gone the extra mile this time!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised the record's that low. It's only two a day, on average. It's a lot of time... but it's not like you have to do anything. If you pick movies with poor attendance you can just be on your phone the whole time, like anyone watching that much TV every year.