this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
40 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

10115 readers
471 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

The latest data highlights how Canada has one of the most unusual economies in recent history. Typically population growth and an economic boom go hand-in-hand. People move to a region due to the robust opportunities, contributing to demand, and thus creating more jobs. That’s not what’s happening.

Instead, people are attracted to a stagnant economy in such a large volume, it has an inflationary impact on shelter. An impact that’s so great, shelter costs are eroding general output on a per capita basis.

I wonder if there's a bureaucratic inertia at work: people came here to go to school 4+ years ago, or waited in a queue for however long it took to get in.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Probably means workers will have to take lower salary, since growth initiatives are lower (partly due to interest rates but also companies losing a lot of the optimism of post-pandemic growth projections).

What we urgently need is low-interest loans for small low-risk businesses to ensure the workers can find work. We don't need to lend billions to large corporations or millions to SME that will employ 5 more workers.

Instead, giving out loans of 10k-100k with near zero interest rate to kickstart, preserve or grow low overhead businesses (hairdressers, plumbers, carpenters, home electricians, physiotherapists, private chefs).

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this is saying we’ve been growing the employable workforce faster than we’ve been creating jobs. Or is it saying that we’ve net lost jobs? It’s hard to tell from the way it was phrased.

It also seems to be implying that existing jobs were lost while new jobs were created for immigrants. It’s being very careful to imply that without directly saying it, which makes me question whether that’s actually going on.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The article says:

The country added 57.7k workers for a grand total of 21.72 million in March. Unfortunately the economy also lost 2.2k jobs over that same month.

I read it as

  • +58k new workers
  • -2k jobs

So we've net lost jobs, while we've grown the workforce. At least by my reading.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a total of ~60k less job vacancies?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd phrase it as 60k people without jobs. But basically, yeah.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yup, I read that backwards.

[–] Octospider@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But, according to the government, "we have a labour shortage".

[–] a9249@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

we have a minimum wage labour shortage as no one in their right mind would bother showing up for it given the cost of everything

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You know, if families could survive on a single income, job situation would be a non-issue.

Instead, you've got people working MORE than one job, and entire families needing everyone in the house to work, just to get by. None of this is right.