7of9

joined 1 year ago
[–] 7of9@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (10 children)

The Zombie Survival Guide by Max Brookes is a detailed fictional instruction manual. It's sequel is World War Z which is closer to a normal book, but still has an odd structure of creating a world through interviews ... and the The Zombie Survival Guide book exists within it.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

If individuals changed, corporations would be forced to change (or would die) since they would no longer be profitable. It needs to be both at the same time.

That doesn't negate the positive moral implication of making a pleasant comfortable life while consuming less.

Business as usual for individuals means business as usual for corporations.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Both are needed, corporations must be held account able and individuals need to make changes to how they live ... I don't believe either will actually happen, but that doesn't mean that the morality of choices over resource use suddenly get inverted just because of a bad case of nihilism.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

What is this a computer for ants? It should be at least ... four times bigger.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I never said you should emulate my life, what I said is that taking up less space would be good for the planet ... you get limited time on this rock, it's going to be a lot more limited for your kids if the food chain collapses.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

Depends on how well the first season goes, the producers are a little cautious in case the bears aren't really as viscous as they said on their CVs.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's a reality TV series where D-list personalities are dropped in the middle of the forrest and have to hike out without being eaten by bears.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

When most of the world can live in comfort with less space, then it would be good if everyone would. It would save energy, resources, and leave more room for nature.

Many humans are greedy and want more of everything, including space. Do you think that people who live in mansions do so against their will? Do you think that owning a mansion is good for the planet?

My definition of plenty can be flexible, and thinking about it we could be happy with less space. I lived in a caravan with an ex-boyfriend for a while which was about 20m^2, and space was not the main factor in wanting to move out.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website -1 points 11 months ago

Thank you for your beautifully worded reply.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

Very well put!

[–] 7of9@startrek.website -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because the world is on fire, while the richest humans want to consume more. Your replies are typical of that mindset, you could hardly contain your consumerism while living in an area which in much of the world would be considered large and luxurious.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Ah, ok. You want to consume more, have more stuff, bigger and better and newer and faster.

Well, good luck with that if that's what it takes to make you happy.

view more: ‹ prev next ›