AAA

joined 4 months ago
[–] AAA@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's not just. He should be locked up for his crimes. If people would want him released, they'd have to vote for a candidate who promises to do that. Just being a promising candidate isn't a reason not to be prosecuted. There is simply no law for that.

The justice system is being intimidated by an angry mob into waiting out the situation. This is against everything what the justice system is supposed to do.

It's not the will of "the people", it's the will of a minority. He HAS been voted out. Courts should indeed be more powerful than that.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I understand your viewpoint, but disagree.

By that argument any criminal ever could argue against prosecution because they intend to run for a public office. Ridiculous exaggeration of course, but if Trump gets this chance, everyone else should too.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

You really took the downvotes with grace.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My so called broccoli-potato-gratin with pork neck includes quite an amount of cream, salt, bouillion cubes and cheese. My wife doesn't know and it will stay that way.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The real question is: if Obama gave Trump an obviously terrible plan, with the goal to let as many people die as possible, would Trump have gone out of his way to save each and everyone - simply out of spite for Obama?

Of course he wouldn't have, but I like the idea.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

13% of Democrats agree with Trump on that. What the actual fuck?

No surprise? People have nuanced views, different opinions, from left to center to right, even hardcore racist ones... and vote Democrats. Just as you could find conservatives who do not agree with the statement.

The statement is so vague and loaded and can be agreed or disagreed with from all kinds of people.

Edit: And yes it's quite ironic(?) that so many people agree with this - in a country where people unironically track that they're 12% German, or 20% Irish, or whatever.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The same people who warned us about the dangers of the internet and not to believe everything, are now the ones readily falling for and spreading conspiracies and lies from social media.

It's tragic.

[–] AAA@feddit.org -1 points 3 weeks ago

Totally the same /s

[–] AAA@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I never found anything which scratches the same itch Claymore does.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In my experience: the higher up the management chain, the higher the chance that they are just in for the bonuses - not for the company / industry. And those bonuses are always bound to these numbers which need to go up. When the numbers go down, these people are long gone.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The first people to leave aren't going to be the clock punchers, it will be the best and brightest who can easily find other jobs.

Yes. But some of them are also the most expensive ones, so when they leave costs go down. And we all know "numbers must go up" (=cost must go down).

[–] AAA@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
  • Any content created by the Chinese government's own AI does not get flagged.
 

Hey fellow gamers,

please kindly share your racing game recommendations.

I didn't play any racing games in the last couple of years, so it doesn't need to be the latest titles, can be a bit older too.

I'm searching for something more on the casual side. Definitely no Sim. Are the recent NFS games any good? Like everybody I liked NFS Underground back in the days. Customizing cool cars is definitely a big plus.

Singleplayer campaign or something is required, because no way am I up to compete with people online.

view more: next ›