ALostInquirer

joined 2 years ago
[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft fucking sucks, but I want people to know ways around stuff so they aren’t wasting time and money if they don’t have to.

What is the way around Microsoft accounts during 10/11 setup?

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

As an analogy, you can try taking a selfie using an old laptop’s front-facing camera. You probably won’t like how you look either - you’d look either sickly pale or drunken red, eyebags appear out of nowhere, the distortion of the lens makes you look fat. All of these qualities aren’t because you are any of these things in real life. It’s simply that laptop cameras are bad. Same is true for microphones and speakers.

I think you make a good point with the hardware aspects of this, and on this last point I can't help but be a little amused, as while it's often very true, personally I sometimes prefer the lower res quality of a laptop camera as it can help obfuscate some of the finer details I don't much care for. It's basically a hardware lo-fi filter, and I appreciate it not catching every pore. 😂

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I suspect this is basically it, however I've often thought similar could be said of one's appearance; as it's distorted by different lighting, whether your clothing's gotten wrinkled up a certain way, the wind's messed up your hair, or you accidentally smudged makeup or some dirt on you somewhere. Although that all is also typically easier to adjust (give or take the lighting and wind) than your voice, so that undoubtedly plays into it.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Would you happen to mean readers with filtering tools? If so I'm interested as well.

I know Thunderbird technically has them, but I've had trouble making them work as effectively as I'd like. RSSOwl had some that were easier to work with, but stopped being updated. There's now a fork of it called RSSOwlnix, but I haven't taken the time to see whether it still works as well or not. May be worth looking into though...

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I follow ya. I feel like busywork is probably one of the better words to describe what many in antiwork communities are getting at. Unfulfilling, often for someone else and to their greater profit/benefit over yours and others' own with seemingly no other purpose than that.

In a lot of ways it's a more familiar way of talking about alienated labor without putting people off.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a lil' heads up, this post is from an antiwork community. That aside, which kind of work are you getting fulfillment from? Another comment here makes a good point that these terms are sort of loaded with different meanings for each of us.

Personally I don't find much of my work satisfying because I find it difficult to keep it from helping big businesses in some way.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see where you're coming from, I think. In my experiences with trying to follow tutorials though, I've found the difficulty to be between rough explanations and the examples given feeling a little too simple and isolated from how they might be applied in a working program.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for clarifying! So it does work roughly as I was thinking, that's cool!

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This gives a brief overview of Scuttlebutt with a link to a more technical breakdown.

That said, I remain confused by the other person's description, as I'm not sure how it's accumulating posts while "disconnected from the Internet". I follow how it works when connected, but not so much how it would work as they've described it, at least in the disconnected circumstances, unless it's sorta how I asked.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It was designed such that a Usenet server could spend most of its time disconnected from the Internet and accumulate local posts that would then be federated in a digest when the server dialed up and connected to other servers.

...Would this have been local posts of an individual, or sometimes a group in a LAN or something? The way you describe it here puts me in the mind of recent stuff like Scuttlebutt, albeit that's more clearly individual-focused.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another big, lingering question is why Meta wants to do this in the first place. Lambert says Meta wants to give users more control over their posts and followers, with easier avenues to engage across platforms.

So will they be implementing a method to export this data in ways that could be imported to other platforms? Otherwise I don't see where federation fits in here all that much.

Extending reach isn't really the same as control imo.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How would one use it if they're struggling to understand it to start with? 🤨

view more: ‹ prev next ›