I don't think anything will make me feel older today than the phrase "20th Century movies". Lol.
Adderbox76
Imajica by Clive Barker flipped a switch in my (then) teenage brain making me understand that "fantasy" books don't need to have swords, wizards, and all the other tropes. That the idea of "fantasy" as a genre is far far richer than I imagined.
The writer of the video is (presumably) a paid, working writer. And as such they should know better.
it's like a car reviewer saying "its a friction point that it won't win the Grand Prix" when he's reviewing an '81 Chevette.
Sure. If for whatever reason you need to re-edit something that you didn't shoot yourself and you don't have access to the source files. I suppose that would be one reason to edit the MP4 directly. (so for example, if you're re-editing someone's youtube video to make a remix of it for Tiktok). But I don't consider that to be "professional" editing.
Professional editing is getting hired by a filmmaker (or creating video yourself) that you then edit into a completed work. And in those cases, I'd question why they're either a) filming in a format like MP4 in the first place, or b) not making the LOG or ProRes source files available to their editor.
Video Editing (Free DaVinci Resolve): Free Resolve on Linux lacks native H.264/H.265 MP4 decoding due to licensing. It requires running FFmpeg scripts to transcode footage to ProRes/DNxHR before editing.
If you're editing MP4 directly, you're an amateur who has no business editing anything. MP4 is a compressed finalized format suitable for distribution. It gives you virtually zero wiggle room for color correction, etc...
There's a reason professionals shoot log and shoot in a RAW format that is made specifically for editing. It's only when the project is ready to be exported should you be going anywhere near MP4.
Fair enough. But too many people think privacy and security are the same thing.
GrapheneOS is dedicated to both privacy and security, whereas e/os (while it does have some security improvements over stock android) is much more focused on the privacy side of things.
Why does he look like Colin Farrell going method for an upcoming role?
Gotta be Hyenas

A.I. just loves using that exaggerated DoF bullshit.
I read the book years ago and I think I have to re-read it, but I found it quite forgettable and I don't recall it being as "action" focused as the movie's trailer suggested. In fact, If I'm remembering correctly, it was largely just two characters and dog and it ends when he flies off...
Did I just randomly forget the rest of it, or are the rest of the characters an attempt to pad out the ending to show what happens after that?
morals. Ethics. Basic human decency...

Because the world likes us more than it does them right now and Trump can't stand it.