AfricanExpansionist

Yeah, I guess also we've never really seen a president-- the guy who makes the appointments-- on trial before, so it's definitely something I'd like to see reviewed

I suspect that Trump may yet inspire constitutional amendments in the future, but only after he's been removed from the chessboard

🤡

Lawyers on podcasts I listen to have said it's normal and OK, but that Cannon is the exception who's making it look worse than usual. She's clearly in the tank for Trump. I'd also like to see her impeached.

Sorry that was a rhetorical question: If Republicans support her then why would I vote for her?

So why would I vote for her?

What's cringe about the story?

I'm sorry what's speculation on my part???

Second, Trump said that? Oh yeah, he means whatever he says all the time. He never lies, he never talks out of his ass, he ever makes promises he won't keep

Meanwhile, the current administration has failed to act at every "red line" crossed by Israel and continues to ACTUALLY SUPPLY Israel with weapons to continue its genocide.

Sorry that my "purity test" is "no complicity in killing children".

And I'm sorry to see you feel that killing children is "a complicated situation".

OK again, it's pure speculation. First, that's a Senator, who doesn't even have the authority to use nuclear weapons. Second, the Democrats have shown that they love Netanyahu and will do whatever he wants. If he calls for nukes, maybe a Harris administration will consider it. After all, the party all enthusiastically clapped for the genocide

Who is going to nuke Palestine? That's pure speculation.

Meanwhile, the current administration is ACTUALLY actively helping Israel starve, maim, and kill children

2016 was also "easy"

Yes, I'm "monstrous", but not the Democrats who have happily supplied Israel with weapons to commit their genocide.

Your moral compass is broken.

My eyes glazed over before I finished the first paragraph