AmbitiousProcess

The entire artist's portfolio is just "women bad and ugly and stupid. gay bad and weird. fat people ugly. cheating funny when man does it. wife only want sex because I buy her things." I fuckin hate this shitty boomer "humor" so much. It's all just disguising thinly-veiled fears about masculinity, beauty standards, and relationships, but dressing it up as "jokes."

...and it's always the worst art style imaginable, too 😭

It can often still have better range, even within an apartment building, since 2.4GHz will penetrates walls easier.

However, interference can be different, because 5Ghz has more channels, and many devices still primarily operate on 2.4GHz instead of 5GHz, meaning 5GHz can be interfered with less than 2.4GHz.

At the end of the day, it will depend on your environment, as interference can be a big factor, but regardless, you'll almost always find you have better, consistent signal range with 2.4GHz than 5GHz, because it's just that much better at penetrating solid objects, irrespective of interference.

And it's more expensive than the most expensive US mobile plan, which would have faster speeds, whereas Trump Mobile's drops off after a certain (lower than T-Mobile's own plans) amount of GB data usage since they're solely using T-Mobile as an MVNO, and also has deprioritized data speeds during periods of network congestion.

It would also get you the ability to switch underlying network providers if you're in a dead zone, international calling and data in more locations, better customer support given all the experiences we've seen from reviewers, and unlimited hotspot data, plus better bundle deals for families or people with smart watches that need separate data.

Hell, even T-Mobile's own own plans, which are usually substantially more expensive than other companies they solely act as an MVNO for, like Mint Mobile, (which is actually owned by T-Mobile now) which will get you the same value as T-Mobile's $50/mo plan in a $30/mo plan that is just $15/mo for new users for up to a 12 month period.

Trump Mobile is just $2.55 cheaper than T-Mobile's $50 plan.

The CDC’s “vaccine safety” page now claims that the statement “vaccines do not cause autism” is not based on evidence because it doesn’t rule out the possibility that infant vaccines are linked to the disorder.

This dumbfuck doesn't understand that science can't fully rule anything out. That's why science continues to evolve, and things we once thought were true change over time as we get more evidence.

Science explains what we see in the world, it doesn't magically explain every possible outcome of every possible thing we look at.

No shit you can't "rule out the possibility", because you can't have an omnipotent view of every possible way every chemical reaction occurs ever between any infant and any vaccine.

What we can do, is look at how vaccines and autism rates are correlated, engage in numerous studies, and find out that there is no observable causal link between the two, or even a statistically significant correlation. That is the closest we can possibly get to "ruling it out."

You wanna know what there is an observable causal link for? Viruses killing people that would otherwise not have gotten sick from the virus had they gotten the vaccine.

Jfc we are so cooked as a nation.

I went to her profile expecting her to be the usual brainbroken conservative, and instead she's like, complaining about a reply getting removed because it had the F slur in it, but she also replied to one of Elon's AI-generated videos about his Tesla robot saying "Get the fuck out of here with this clanker bullshit", so I respect it.

I could eat a party size bag of these things and still be craving more.

Good ass snack.

potentially possible
necessarily required

Took me a second to realize how it was meant to be interpreted.

The fact that we could plausibly interpret it as trump calling him correct about something in some way though is still immensely disappointing about our reality.

"Don't you see? Those people find civil rights offensive too! Why don't we just compromise and only call klan hoods "divisive" rather than "hateful." That will solve the issue!"

"I can explain, your honor... whoopsies! :3"

Anyone.

According to regulations.gov:

Absolutely anyone can submit a public comment on an agency’s proposed regulation. You do not have to be an academic, expert, or even someone who knows all of the ins and outs of the policy at hand. If you have something to say and think that your perspective could constructively add to the conversation, please comment.

Increase alertness

Decrease alertness

lmao