ArmoredCavalry

joined 2 years ago
[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I started off on an Ender 3 V2 a few years back. The AnkerMake M5C and Bambu A1 Mini are both down to $199 and can't believe how much faster / more reliable they are for the price.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I'm actually blown away by how good of a 3D Printer you can get for ~$200 now. Huge improvement from just a few years ago.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

That's a good example! I have a RG35XX, and definitely fun to see how far gaming tech has come.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I was thinking of something that would be considered futuristic to an average person today. So, maybe something uncommon, with impressive capabilities, but still affordable?

Not sure if many items fit that criteria, but was curious if any!

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Many are, but as far as I know, no hosting provider has ever tried something like what was claimed (which is why it made such news).

It seems like many people didn't even verify that portion of ToS was new (checking web archive), or wait for Vultr's response before closing their accounts.

Even after the official response, it feels like people stuck to their original assumptions and felt justified moving services?

Companies, and specifically the people in them, make mistakes. What matters is their reaction. I'm scratching my head to think what Vultr could do better in this case (other than creating a time machine to avoid the initial screw up).

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Vultr posted their response to the concerns here - https://www.vultr.com/news/a-note-about-vultrs-terms-of-service/

The portion of the ToS that people were worried about had been in place for years and had nothing to do with server intellectual property. They are removing it to avoid future confusion.

I don't disagree that it was poorly worded, but the amount of people jumping to the worst possible conclusions on this is concerning. What happened to Hanlon's Razor?

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Weird! For reference one VM I run on only has 1 GB of memory, and Netdata uses 100-200 MB. Could be something going on with UnRAID though. Definitely some sort of bug I'd think, since normally resource usage should be very low across the board.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's strange, I've run it fine on some very underpowered hardware. Are you adding a specific monitoring integration with it, or just out of the box settings?

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As others stated, you can run and access the interface locally (or setup your own reverse proxy) for free. Their Cloud dashboard is also free for up to 5 nodes. They recently added a flat-rate "Homelab" plan as well, if you want to remove the limit. It's all quite usable for $0 otherwise though!

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I'm a huge fan of Netdata, very configurable and monitors just about anything you could want. Great interface and alerts too - https://www.netdata.cloud/

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Worth noting that this should not affect you if you are only using tunnels (no DNS entries / open ports).

52
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

When the idea of self-driving cars first started becoming mainstream, I remember a lot of debate about liability. If an accident occurs, who would be at fault? I think a lot of those questions are still unanswered.

Fast forward and now we have software like ChatGPT. I assume they'll only become more capable (and connected) over time.

Which makes it strange I haven't really heard any similar discussion around liability. What happens when it makes mistakes or causes damage?

Maybe in people's minds it doesn't matter, because AI is either something that helps with homework questions, or something that's taking over humanity. Reality is probably in between those two, with much more mundane mistakes or damages done.

What happens when the first ransomware is deployed by AI, on behalf of a user who just wanted tips on how to make more side income?

 
view more: next ›