Atomic

What is it you think we're talking about? This isn't some LLM. It's a very specific purposebuilt piece of software to analyse data from earthquakes and recordable shifts in the tectonic plates.

I disagree with your assessment. Modern machine learning methods will result in a far more complex algorithm than any human could device on their own. It will be "cheap" to execute, but only because of the vast amount of data it's been trained on. That's the strength. The raw number of calculations it can do per second means it can sift through more data in a day than a human could in its lifetime.

The biggest danger is hidden local minimums that can potentially distort new results and findings. But that's not unique to machine learning. And you can let the AI grade its result with how certain it is. Automatically flag any result that falls below a certain threshold. And again, this is where the danger of local minimum come in. Because it can raise the certainty of results when maybe it shouldn't be so certain. Though you will find out quickly when results are false with high certainty. Then you go back and you keep working at it.

As of this particular topic of earthquakes. There are no traditional tools of accurately predicting them. We've never been able to do it before. Now they think this might be able to. So we will just have to wait and see if its predictions are accurate or not.

How about you read the article before you start being outraged over your own false assumptions

Maybe he did mid air from a heart attack

It actually is one of the primary sports for women in the US. And their womens team is one of the best, having won the world cup 4 times, 91, 99, 15 and 19

And for 1 in 4 sportsfans to follow football in the US isnt THAT bad. More than i expected.

Cyber attacks in general have not required any particular skill for at least the past 20 years.

Of course depends on what you want to do and who you want to do it to. But those with great skill also decided to write software to make it easier for themselves. And these programs can be found if you want to find them

Funny that, I've learned how to spell that word in four different languages. But mistakes tend to happen when typing quickly on a phone. Your concern and attempt at deflection is noted.

Not to be that guy, but that's some weak ass strawman bullshit.

Surely you can think of a more solid point of critisism than whatever that was.

Yes. This happens, literally, every single day across the world. We even have a word for it. Asylum

So this begs the question, what magical world do you live in?

Let me put it this way. I dont doubt he personally donated that money. They claim to get this from the partys own disclosures.

However. I've never heard of "Örebropartiet" i quickly read they're the biggest party outside of the parlamental parties, though that doesn't really say much in itself to be honest. And quite frankly, no one outside of Örebro gives a fuck about what's going on in Örebro. No offense.

Nor have I ever heard of this publication "Flamman", that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper. My point being. You'd struggle to find a more biased source of information on what they call a "far extreme right party"

Not to say what they claim is false. I'm just saying. I would cross referrence with other publications given their obvious bias

6% of 80. 1% of 80 is 0.8 0.8 * 6 is (8 * 6)/10 Which is 48/10 = 4.8

80% of 6. I'd probably think of it as (4/5) * 6 = 24/5 Which is 20/5 + 4/5 = 4 + 4/5 = 4.8

Both are easy if you know how to visualise it. The benefit of knowing you can "reverse" it is that you can choose which method is easier for you to visualise. Which is incredibly useful for a lot of people

Edit: lemmy hates the * sign

If that's what you think, you severely underestimate how much money there is in the world.