Cyber attacks in general have not required any particular skill for at least the past 20 years.
Of course depends on what you want to do and who you want to do it to. But those with great skill also decided to write software to make it easier for themselves. And these programs can be found if you want to find them
Funny that, I've learned how to spell that word in four different languages. But mistakes tend to happen when typing quickly on a phone. Your concern and attempt at deflection is noted.
Not to be that guy, but that's some weak ass strawman bullshit.
Surely you can think of a more solid point of critisism than whatever that was.
Yes. This happens, literally, every single day across the world. We even have a word for it. Asylum
So this begs the question, what magical world do you live in?
Let me put it this way. I dont doubt he personally donated that money. They claim to get this from the partys own disclosures.
However. I've never heard of "Örebropartiet" i quickly read they're the biggest party outside of the parlamental parties, though that doesn't really say much in itself to be honest. And quite frankly, no one outside of Örebro gives a fuck about what's going on in Örebro. No offense.
Nor have I ever heard of this publication "Flamman", that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper. My point being. You'd struggle to find a more biased source of information on what they call a "far extreme right party"
Not to say what they claim is false. I'm just saying. I would cross referrence with other publications given their obvious bias
6% of 80. 1% of 80 is 0.8 0.8 * 6 is (8 * 6)/10 Which is 48/10 = 4.8
80% of 6. I'd probably think of it as (4/5) * 6 = 24/5 Which is 20/5 + 4/5 = 4 + 4/5 = 4.8
Both are easy if you know how to visualise it. The benefit of knowing you can "reverse" it is that you can choose which method is easier for you to visualise. Which is incredibly useful for a lot of people
Edit: lemmy hates the * sign
If that's what you think, you severely underestimate how much money there is in the world.
Spotify didn't start seeing yearly profits until 2024.
Twitter didn't see profits in a single quarter until 12 years after they started. And only went 2 years with actual profits from inception until they were bought out.
Took YouTube 9 years before they saw any profits.
Point being. It's very normal for big tech companies to not make money for quite some time. OpenAI isn't alone. It's the rule rather than the exception.
Will they go tits up? I don't know. Time will tell. But my guess is that investors will keep pumping in money for at least another 10 years.
Could you present a weaker strawman if you tried?
You aint solving hunger by stealing ribeyes crabs and lobsters.
Normal people that struggle financially seek help from the government, they go to food banks, there is help to get without having to resort to stealing.
You don't just wake up one morning and all of a sudden have to steal to survive. This isn't the US. (The hint is in the £ sign)
Your edit just reeks of doubling down.
they're not accepted in court in texas
But you still say "they're not generally admissable in court". So where is this generally coming from? Does that apply to the entire US? Do you have any source to back it up with?
Well, according to this terrible website. The firm is practising in East Texas
It actually is one of the primary sports for women in the US. And their womens team is one of the best, having won the world cup 4 times, 91, 99, 15 and 19
And for 1 in 4 sportsfans to follow football in the US isnt THAT bad. More than i expected.