Broken

joined 7 months ago
[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I remember when the EGAs came about. Damn, it was like stepping into the future. But I didn't have a color monitor so it didn't matter. I was probably more envious than your friend.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Most" is optimistic. I don't have statistical information proving otherwise, but anecdotally I am not so sure. A big company like Disney with their own team of IT and official policies and this still happened is exhibit A.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'll second the recommendation for GrapheneOS. One of the available options I use is to keep mic, camera, and location off at all times until I need them. That simple toggle ability changes your privacy stance greatly.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm with you on the philosophy of tech freedom, which is why I'm back to trying Linux again. So yeah, we'll take that journey together.

I just think its over simplified by most, and I guess I got the wrong impression of you by your 15 minute comment.

I've seen multiple people recently post something like, I've switched to Linux and can never go back...but I hated it for a year. That makes so much sense to me, and I just feel that most Linux users leave off the learning curve part, and just gloss over to fully knowledgeable use.

So many people just don't have the time or energy to just jump into something new. I've been using windows for 30 years, and learned a lot along the way. Its going to be tough to learn Linux without daily usage and experimentation (and totally screwing stuff up). That's a tough pill for most people to swallow.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Worrying about learning an new OS isn't as simple as you make it. It takes time, dedication, and will power to work through the pain points.

Most Linux users give answers like "just use Linux" but it's not that simple. Yes, it's easier to switch these days because more and more apps are browser/cloud based. But technically a chrome book would be an easier switch if that's the mentality.

I "use" my PC. I don't simply check email and go on Facebook. I'm currently trying Linux for probably the 4th or 5th time. It's easier to get into these days, but it still functions completely differently than Windows, as it should.

For example, It took me at least an hour to figure out how to partition and mount a drive. There's some not so clear information out there so finding the right info wasn't as easy as it should be. OK no big deal, now I know, but I don't necessarily want to chase answers like that every time I use my computer.

Lastly, I've never accepted using Wine as a work around for unsupported programs. OK, maybe if you have 1, but not if you have 6. That's not an acceptable solution when your needs scale up like that. And I have many. I'm not going to 100% get away from Windows. It sucks, but it's reality.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think anything is un-addictable (making up words here). I do agree that the social media mindset and fedi are not compatible though, basically because of the algorithm concept.

At the end of the day I hate all social media because they feed me what they think I want to eat. Regardless of how well they do that I hate the concept because I want to decide for myself what I want to partake in. Fedi allows that without getting in my way.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I tried a handful, and the one I liked best is Thunder. There were aspects I liked about Voyager too, but Thunder was set up better in my opinion.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

GOS play services are sandboxed by default, it's how they implement it. The sandbox just keeps it from having full system root integration so its not in everything by default like normal android. It still is full play services though.

What I'm saying is that if you don't want that on your phone but you do want to use apps that rely on it then you can set up a secondary profile. On the second profile install play services and any apps that need it. That way its segregated from your main activity. Other profiles are essentially viewed as their own phone installation so they dont talk to each other.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is common with bank apps. They basically use google as their security instead of programming their own. That's typically why people run a secondary profile with play services enabled.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

They already grabbed the data when you gave them access to your contacts with their current model.

That's what confuses me, I'm not seeing what their benefit is in this. They have one, and I'm sure it's nefarious, but I don't see it.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sow doubt. As in spreading it like seeds to take root and grow. 100% in agreement with you, just being a grammar Nazi. Carry on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›