Bye

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (9 children)

It uses Wi-Fi and has sms fallback and works with iMessage

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I like having Siri in my car when she works. Like when my phone properly wirelessly connects. But when it doesn’t, I hate it, and would be better without it.

Also why the hell can’t CarPlay use the radio, when the car has a radio. Why can’t those two things talk to each other. Fucking dumb.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I have a rule regarding what packages I allow myself to use. I must be able to re-write whatever functionality I’m using in the package. That way when it doesn’t work as expected, I either write my own, or debug their code.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Zoning reforms sound great.

One of my biggest issues with increasing housing is that many Americans store their wealth in their house. Home ownership is the retirement plan for many, or the generational wealth plan. So how can we build housing without devaluing existing housing?

The answer is to build more multi-family housing, which doesn’t really compete with single family housing for price. The former is mostly for rent, while the later is for owning.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Other countries have capitalism and they have transit.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Taco Bell still has $1.25 bean and rice burritos where I live. It’s like 400 calories so it’s a pretty good deal.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  1. Transition to renewable energy faster

  2. Consider environmental pollution an act of war, because we really are getting to that point. Yes this will be seen as the west “pulling the ladder back up after themselves”; ask the corals if they give a shit

  3. Those won’t be enough, maybe we can put some mirrors in orbit to cool the world down just a tiny tiny bit, then de-orbit it the mirrors.

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Any policy can disproportionately affect the birth rate of one group vs another. Is improving abortion access eugenics? Is incentivizing having children via the tax code eugenics because those incentives are stronger for some groups compared to others? Is for-profit healthcare eugenics because it makes it more difficult for poor folks to safely have children? Are fossil fuels eugenics because they lead to higher infant mortality in poorer industrial areas?

No, none of those things are eugenics

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (5 children)

By that argument, the lower rate of reproduction is western countries is eugenics, since it’s a consequence of policy (education).

Actually one of the best things that poor folks can do to escape generational poverty, is to have fewer kids. That way, kids inherit a larger share of their grandparents assets, and more can be passed down. Generational land ownership, for example, is extremely powerful. Fewer children per family also lowers the financial burden of education, enabling better education for comparatively fewer people. That’s not eugenics, it’s smart family planning.

view more: next ›