As much as I hate those silly headlines I don't change them. The editor will have to live with the shame.
CAVOK
I'd say yes and no. The strain on the planet would lessen for sure. But then we have the dependency ratio, meaning the amount of people in work related to those out of work, like children, the elderly, disabled etc.
This are getting worse in every European country. More babies won't fix it, at least not in the short term but it'll lessen the impact in about 20 years.
To fix the dependency ratio you either drasticly reduce the welfare state, increase the retirement age, raise taxes, or accept a lot of immigrants. Any of those options appealing to the general public you think?
Which is why there's an archive link as well.
I see it as a shopping list.
Agreed, just because the US has gone dumb, doesn't make China a good guy.
Perhaps, but I didn't want to sensationalize it.
LeMonde has a little more about it. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2025/05/21/french-report-warns-of-subtle-but-subversive-spread-of-muslim-brotherhood-ideology_6741471_7.html
Basically it's about promoting an extreme version of Islam, mostly funded by countries like Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
Not sure. English isn't my first language. I interpret it as shots in the general direction of the diplomats, not specifically aimed at. I could be wrong.
Not surprised.