CaptSneeze

joined 1 year ago
[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

If this the same person who did the 2 hour Disney Star Wars hotel one? I put that on because of the buzz about it on Lemmy, just expecting to get the idea and quit after 2 minutes. Ended up watching the whole damn thing.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

i can sew my own clothes and bake?

Weird. Creepy.

Hard disagree. I wish I knew how (and had the time to) make my own clothes. And, who doesn’t love baked goods? These both sound awesome.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m noticing, but failing to see why that’s significant. Is something interesting going on with spaceX?

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

You pass! I’ve done several thousands of these over the past decade.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The circumference is where everyone lives. The area is comparatively empty.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

The bigger reason I don’t go to McDonald’s is because of the self serve kiosks they’ve forced on us instead of paying people to run the registers.

Price is still a reason though, so I’m glad they are at least considering that as well.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The same dark comedy thought crossed my mind!

I expect they might retire and replace the existing judges, one every two years, in order of length of time already served. This would make it so they start this new system off already having 9 seats filled.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honest question: Could all of the other stuff you’ve suggested happen without getting into amendment territory? I honestly don’t know almost anything about where all these SC things are defined in law, but changing the way the entire SC operates sounds pretty extreme when compared with simply adding term limits. It’s hard to believe it wouldn’t also stray into some constitutional territory.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought so too, but I just went searching for the source and it appears that everyone gives attribution for this as “according to the WSJ”, and the WSJ attributes it to “people familiar with the matter”. So, no actual statement from Musk that I could find.

That said, I still think he’s likely contributing to a PAC (which makes it technically true that isn’t directly giving to Trump…). I also suspect that it’s very likely he has an agreement with the PAC that they will then spend this money on ads at Twitter, though I have no evidence to back that up.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or… “I work hard and live modestly in a small apartment with two dogs that I love. Oops, the landlord just jacked up my rent and I can no longer afford it, and the multi-billion dollar company I work for refuses to allow pay increases to help their low-paid employees deal with inflating prices. Now, I have to live in my car briefly while I figure this situation out.”

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don’t know enough to have my own solid thoughts on this, but people I trust and know more than me have all said that Tesla is wildly over valued compared with any other auto makers and considering their P to E. Considering that, I’ve been thinking that once the Musk distortion field goes away, the price may just drop down to where it “should be” by normal standards.

My heart agrees with what you’ve said, implying that musk is actually holding back the price at this point, but my brain says that might not actually be true.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Great, thanks!

view more: next ›