Chozo

It’s not my belief – just look at the raw data and what psychologists say. We don’t know everything, obviously, but we know quite enough.

What psychologists say that we know enough? I've never heard this claimed by a professional in the field before.

e: I’m not talking about what psychologists can learn, I’m talking about us, the public.

It's not up to the public to learn the intricacies of psychopathy. You and I aren't the ones who need or can make use of that data.

Elon is like Trump.

In that, they're both assholes who have influence over people's lives? Yeah, exactly. Literally my point.

We shouldn't let them operate in the shadows. They need to be exposed. Every single time.

We’ve learnt all we can from these psychopaths, to be honest.

What makes you believe this?

I feel like this was an exception to the rule, since he was still at large for a while and it was imperative to the public safety that people knew who he was and what he looked like.

That said, yes, the media does need to pull back on publishing details about the killers in these situations.

Because the things he says and does affect real people, and it's important that this behavior is known so that he doesn't get away with his shitty misdeeds in secrecy.

Which one: the Flipper Zero, or the bluetooth spamming function?

Flipper Zero is a thing because it's a very capable device for hackers and tinkerers. It can be used as an intro to coding and pen-testing.

The bluetooth spam is a thing because some dev is an asshole.

It's not open source. At least, not in the conventional sense. The source is available, but it's not under a traditional OSS license.

I'm not defending it, dipshit. I'm explaining how generative AI training works.

The fact that you can't see that is what's really concerning.

It knows what naked people look like, and it knows what children look like. It doesn't need naked children to fill in those gaps.

Also, these models are trained with images scraped from the clear net. Somebody would have to had manually added CSAM to the training data, which would be easily traced back to them if they did. The likelihood of actual CSAM being included in any mainstream AI's training material is slim to none.

Some things should be censored, and I don't think that's too hot of a take, either. Any material that encourages intolerance of others should not be accepted in any civil culture.

If the content creators left Reddit, they certainly didn't come here.

There are plenty of porn stars who stream non-porn content on Twitch. Porn stars are allowed to have more than one interest, y'know. And for the more risque/lewd content like hot tub streams, Twitch literally has a separate category on their platform specifically designed so that the more "adult" content isn't in the main feeds to begin with.