Chozo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 70 points 1 year ago

"Hurry up, we're gonna be late for our reservation."

"Hold on, my dress has to install an update!"

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So, when you said "The device has never existed", you realize how that was a bit misleading, right? The way you've been presenting this situation would suggest that Google enabled 2FA in an impossible manner.

The device existed. You ignored the warnings and wiped the device before transferring your authentication elsewhere. There's plenty of things to be critical of Google over, but flagrant user error like this isn't one of them.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right. I think you can see where I'm going with this. The fact that you're being dodgy with the question is making me question your motives with this post.

So, what device? You don't have to tell me the name, but describe it to me. Is it the device that you flashed a new OS onto?

[–] Chozo@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What device does it say it's sending the request to?

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You’re wrong, btw, the Google Prompts feature is Default and cannot be turned off.

Only if there's a previously-authenticated device. That setting can't be enabled without a key, and one of the required keys is produced locally by a logged-in device (which is why your device is trusted to stay logged in indefinitely). If enabled without a key, it's nonfunctional and should error itself out and revert to a disabled state.

If that somehow hasn't happened (which, in all honesty, would be very surprising to learn) and the setting is enabled on your account, then that'd be something you'd need to submit a request to Google to have fixed, otherwise you have zero recovery on that account.

Are you a thousand percent sure you've never had any other device logged into that Google account? When you attempt to log in, it should show you the device name it's sending the request to. For instance, when I log into my Gmail from an Incognito window right now, it says to check my Pixel 6 Pro. What's it saying for you?

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Deprecating SMS authentication is a good thing, in all honesty. SMS is not a secure form of data transfer, and is trivially intercepted. You can buy and setup an illegal Stingray device relatively easily, and capture basically all wireless data from a phone within range.

That said, if the device was truly never used for 2FA, then there wouldn't be any push-based 2FA on the account to begin with. Unless there's another device that's been authenticated with your account somewhere, like an old phone. In which case, that's where your login requests are being pushed to. That's a setting that can only be enabled by successfully authenticating with a device at least once in the past.

If there was never any other authenticated device, then that setting on your account isn't there. Enabling that feature is a two-step process, and step 1 involves configuration on a local device before it can be enabled remotely on your account.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I don't get this. Is this an SMS-based 2FA? If so, I'm not sure that Google has any ability to block that. Your carrier might, though, but that wouldn't be controlled by your device's OS. The option being greyed out on a third-party site has little to do with anything happening locally on your device.

If this is a push-based 2FA, then... yeah, you wiped the device, along with any tokens previously stored on it. This is also why any time you set up 2FA on any service, almost all of them warn you like a million times "If you lose or transfer your device before disabling 2FA, you will lose access to your account" before you complete the process.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just curious, how does WP federation work with Lemmy/Kbin or other Fediverse platforms?

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

It sounds like it was a fake Steam link. At least, that's what I assume is meant by "under cover of a game on the Steam platform".

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Gotta love reading opinions from people who don't know what they're talking about.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Fantastic. This was a flagrant abuse of the patent process.

I hate to be the one to suck corpo dick here, but part of me hopes Google sues Sonos into oblivion for damages over this, then buys up the remaining scraps of their team, and sunsets their project.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't get why this would be a problem. It's just a poster image.

Hell, even if they used AI for the in-show VFX, I still don't see why it would be an issue. Almost all VFX for the last several years have been using some level of AI tools.

view more: ‹ prev next ›