Ciderpunk

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

I know some people say it as a joke, but the whole “my pronouns are ‘none’” thing really resonates with me because ideally to me, no one would refer to me at all. I get really uncomfortable when people remember facts about me, it just feels really weird. So thinking that people might talk about me when I’m not around is discomforting too.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I’ve been getting shit my entire life for the fact that things like making a phone call or responding to a text message are insurmountable tasks for me, but I can tell you exactly what’s wrong with your car’s engine just by listening to it for a minute or two…

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Would it be motivational to tell you to be the change you want to see in the world?

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I’m like, 2 peoples cup of tea. But I’d die for either of them and they’d do the same for me, and that’s all I really need tbh.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

I’m in this picture and I ~~don’t like it~~ have made peace with the fact that this will always be me.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My guy, every definition of genocide is predicated on intentionality. Look it up.

You can argue this all you want, but when does something become intentional when you know about it and do not act to stop it? The Soviets at best knew people were dying and did nothing. Is that affirmation of the outcome, and therefore intentionality?

I knew you wouldn’t be able to resist biting the Xinjiang bait, but nice try citing a historical policy that is no longer in effect that has nothing to do with the very present low birth-rate situation.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

My guy, Douglas Tottle’s central thesis wasn’t that the genocide didn’t happen, it was that it was unintentional. He uses the exact same arguments holocaust deniers use of muddying facts and saying “well no one explicitly signed a document saying kill all these people so did it really happen?” You can do better. Unrelated but evidence he cites couldn’t have possibly have been obtained by him without working with the Soviets, which speaks to who was in control of the narrative in the book, because the Soviets sure as shit weren’t gonna work with anyone who was going to blame them.

Also cool of you to insist that the EU somehow made Russia do this. And that the existence of some people who might be Nazis totally justifies killing indiscriminately inside another country. Do you think Russia’s treatment of LGBT people would justify someone invading them and killing indiscriminately to “solve” that situation?

Not to mention that the literal Nazis used the exact same justification of “ethnic Germans are being mistreated in the Sudetenland, so we must invade and intervene” as the Russians are doing right now.

I bet you think Xinjiang is just suffering from “abnormally low birth rates” too.

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Hey, quick question, were those votes held before or after Russian troops were occupying those regions?

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

We have a mandatory approval system for our GitHub at work, but literally no one ever actually looks at PRs, they just blindly approve them. When I first joined the team I tried to actually read them, not knowing this was just formality and got shit on for pointing out errors and stuff like… why the hell are reviews mandatory if everyone just clicks approve without looking? As far as I can tell this system only exists so management can blame the entire team when something goes wrong instead of one person by saying "well someone else should've noticed". And god forbid I am doing something I'm not super familiar with and would like someone else to take a look…

[–] Ciderpunk@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am in sweat pants or pj pants every second I am not required to be in public. Also denim sucks but I find it more tolerable if I get the jeans that have a decent percentage of elastic, those are just way more comfortable but still look the part.

Also nothing can touch my forearms. I don’t like wearing short sleeve shirts because they are too breezy, but I absolutely must roll up the sleeves of any long sleeve shirts so they aren’t touching my forearms. I live in a place where 0°F (-18°C) isn’t uncommon during the winter, so I will tolerate a coat because it’s more painful to be cold but if I’m shoveling snow or whatever, you bet you’re gonna see some weirdo with his coat sleeves mashed up over his elbows but also wearing gloves… I’ve gotten more than a few comments about that look.

view more: next ›