CommanderCloon

Publicly traded companies, which we've all learned to hate and not take as our friends, are in no way comparable to Steam which is privately owned. Gabe Newell is in no way forced by shareholders to push for increased profits, the company has no interest in pushing for enshittification unlike VC funded startups.

Of all the arguments people made about the sentencing, this one is the stupidest

Why not just make a tunnel and forget the vacuum? It's just a subway system, but it's efficient

Edit: France & England might have dug a tunnel but Paris and London just have a subway. And train to move around the country.

Edit2: fixed wording

A lower pay means the CEO will just move where he'll get that salary. It's very unfortunately a result of supply and demand, which pretty much everyone is forced to partake in, which includes mozilla

Fucking Christ, and people ask why that shit should be forbidden???

You're so used to reading bullshit, arm length ingredients lists that the homeopathy industry's bullshit "ingredients" list is ALL water and you don't realize it.

Each of the "30c" or above is PURE WATER. The whole bottle is pure water!

At 4c the average distribution of announced ingredients to water is 10 parts per billion of "active" molecules. At 12c you get an average of 0.6 molecule per litter.you most likely have way less than a hundred molecules per billion. That's pure water.

I'm not saying that it doesn't work -- I'm saying that instead of paying idk what price for it you could just use distilled or even tap water and get the same results, and not fund a bunch of absolute crooks.

Source

Edit: oh and each of the "active" ingredients is not actually active. It's just a bunch of pseudoscientific bullshit that have been given the chance, thousands of times, to prove its efficiency, and NEVER managed to. Not explaining how they would somehow do it, no, just prove that what they're offering is in any way better than placebo. They've always been entirely incapable of proving it.

And potentially lifesaving but it doesn't address the core issue and makes a ton of profits for crooks instead of funding actual research

No actually they have a more open stance if the stream is properly labeled and just won't promote those labels on their front page

It is larger than the US but conservatives fighting climate change measures is a global problem

I wouldn't call this a step in the tight direction. A call for a step yeah, but it's not actually a step until something is actually done

Public outrage more often drives justice for public figures than what law enforcement does on its own. The level of control you're asking for would simply nuke the press.

How would you possibly enforce that, or prevent people from just copying publicly available pictures for nefarious usage