CommanderZander

joined 6 months ago
[–] CommanderZander@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] CommanderZander@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What's important is individual choice. You should keep systems that exhaust you at arms length, & integrate systems that benefit you into your life. Everyone should have options for structuring their life to suit their idiosyncratic needs.

Edit: Also, keep in mind that news orgs make money by showing you technological failures.

[–] CommanderZander@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I appreciate that, but I find it a satisfying challenge for approximate algorithms.

 

I only recently learned about Turtle but it seems like a fun way to represent data. I'm curious to learn more & mess around with it or similar formats for representing the meaning of English text. Anyone have any suggestions for projects, libraries, etc to look into?

[–] CommanderZander@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are right, it's easy to imagine the open source standard being a small financial threat. But a similar situation could potentially still happen, just without the malice the previous poster is imagining. Overall, large orgs make the biggest ripples in software development, so their choices of what to support affect what's most available to users.

[–] CommanderZander@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Several people told me to skip Consider Phlebas & start with the next one, The Player of Games. I did that & found it perfectly accessible & enjoyable. Haven't read any others yet.

Player of Games features a civilization that is both congenial & incredibly high tech. There is a satisfying exploration of sci-fi board games, including a game with a ludicrously complex board that stretches over several tennis courts. I liked it.