btw, if you put double spaces at the end of a line, it makes a new line without a new paragraph:
It's not DNS
There's no way it's DNS
It was DNS
Deebster
joined 2 years ago
Assuming an alternative goal is indeed the logical response here. It is plausible that the opposing team recognised that they could not triumph against a Vulcan team and set themselves a more achievable goal, for example scoring within 80%.
I've used some of their components in a little helper program that was scraping some stats from a service without an API, so Servo code will end up in plenty of projects besides Firefox (and Tauri). Good news for all of us.
Yeah, I was thinking it's like the "Voyager Has Left the Solar System" story - we've heard that several times over the years, and probably will again.
I use this too, and find it better in almost every way.
Swapping @ and " is a mixed blessing since the quote is used quite a lot when coding, but then so is the @. In prose I prefer to use US-style double quotes for quotations and leave single quotes for contractions, possession, etc, so I have to do that awkward shift-2 combo a lot.
Having an extra key is great for us coders since we use most of those weird glyphs (never used ¬) and having easy access to # is chefkiss.png.
ISO layout's tall enter key is great for touch typing since you don't need to be very accurate with your little finger and moving the | \ key next to Z is much more convenient. I like the symmetry of the slash keys, too.
Alt-Gr make loads of shortcuts easier, although occasionally I want that key to be a normal alt instead.
Top one is ISO-UK:
I was responding to "the bean counters running the company need to be replaced with engineers" by pointing out that the man at the top is, at least by training, an engineer.
Let's look at the timeline:
- 1985 - Muilenburg joins Boeing
- Aug 2011 - 737 Max announced
- Dec 2013 - Muilenburg becomes president of Boeing
- July 2015 - Muilenburg becomes CEO of Boeing
- Jan 2016 - First 737 Max flight
- Mar 2017 - FAA certifies 737 Max
- May 2017 - First 737 Max commercial flight
- Oct 2018 - Lion Air Flight 610 crashes
- Mar 2019 - Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashes
- Dec 2019 - Muilenburg resigned
Dennis Muilenburg, whose strategy appears to be to maximize the share price for stockholders, and the executive team that holds stock and options. Having returned nearly $50 billion to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks over the last five years, rather than invest in new products to better compete with Airbus, Boeing’s market share is falling and, given the aforementioned failures, is losing its reputation for quality and safety.
Are you seriously arguing that a man who is qualified to see the problems and dangers of the 737 Max and then chose to ignore them in favour of pressuring regulators and collecting profits shouldn't be held responsible? He was in a senior position while the development happened and was in the top spot when it was certified. If the head of the company shouldn't be held responsible, who should be?
Ignoring his time as president, four years is definitely enough time to see what kind of leader he was, and all of the internal messages coming out show no attempt to change the culture.
So Tesla gets that $56 billion back? Kinda funny that that causes their share price to drop.
Dennis Muilenburg, the CEO during the 737 Max crashes, was an engineer by training:
He received a bachelor's degree in Aerospace Engineering from Iowa State University, followed by a master's degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the University of Washington.
-- Wikipedia
And, of course, even though he put profits ahead of safety and is therefore partially responsible for hundreds of deaths, he walked away with a $62.2 million golden parachute. The incentives are not aligned with safety, aside from how it affects their share price.
Yeah, definitely, and I can share a similar article: The Coen Brothers Finally Address That One 'Big Lebowski' Theory
It's weird how well making it roleplay works. A lot of the "breaks" of the system have been just by telling it to act in a different way, and the newest, best versions have various experts simulated that combine to give the best answer.
No, you don't need to train it, it's just about the prompt you feed it. You can (and should) add quite a lot of instructions and context to your questions (prompts) to get the best out of it.
"Prompt engineer" is a job/skill for this reason.
You mean "nuclear Gandhi" in the early Civilisation games? That apparently was just an urban legend, albeit one so popular it got actually added (as a joke) in Civ 5.