Tea-an-sum
or
Tea-an-kum?
DerisionConsulting
joined 2 years ago
It broke rule 1.
"Fascism is alive and well in the Roman Catholic (Empire) Church" must not have been the original title of the article you linked.
And Tiktok and youtube.
I hear people bring up the first and second amendment in Canada, they clearly have strong feelings about Rupert's Land and its governance.
If you have a different idea about something like how taxes should be spent, I can hear you out. If all you do is bring up points that don't apply to you from a different county, well, it's embarrassing for both of us.
If you allow for miniseries, then something like Roots (1977) would be one of the older ones that I have seen.
He isn't wrong about China being a security to Canada, and he isn't the first PM to say so.
Things like the Zhao/Chong incident are far more subtle than the leader of a country saying over and over again that they want us to be the 51st state, but it doesn't mean that it's something that we can ignore. Radiation and a shotgun will both you.
You've never seen the "I wouldn't even date you" negging, where adult-aged boys try to trick women into pleading their case to the kid?
I think I go to the bar 2 or 3 times a year, and I've seen it several times. I'm glad that doesn't seem to be as much of a thing in the gay community, at least that I've seen.
Right at the start it has this line
Updated April 18, 2024
So they likely didn't update the URL, because it might break things that linked to it
A foreign megacorp using their money to try to influence Canadian politics.
Bill s-210 is a privacy nightmare, basically requiring you to give your government-issued photo ID to tech companies.
- everything NSFW you have ever looked up is connected to your real life identity.
- Mega corps often bend to government requests for data
- certain things, like being LGBTQ+, get you jailed or killed in some countries
It's about proving who was the original creator/user of the IP, instead of who is the first to file to have that IP protected.
The flipside of this would be having random holding companies just mass filing for ownership of everything posted online, said, written-down, or created, in the hopes that they get approved first so they can sue others, even the creators, for using it.
Look at the "very demure, very mindful" woman, Jools Lebron. Someone else (Jefferson Bates) file to trademark the saying because the original creator didn't think to until after it was viral. Because the laws are ultimately about proving who was the creator, and not who filed first in the USA, it's likely that Jools will get ownership, eventually.
shows that aren’t stupid gimmicks.
I don't own a tv, but what are the gimmick-based shows? Schitt's Creek, Baroness von Sketch Show, and Kim's Convenience are recent(ish) CBC shows that did very well.
That might be the same person, just at work vs at home.
It's loss.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_(Ctrl%2BAlt%2BDel)