Dieterlan

Ah. Account I read must have been a simplified version, probably for kids. Or I just forgot. Pretty sure I got it from D'Aulaire's Book of Greek Myths

I thought he was autosexual/romantic, if anything. This is the "stare into the water admiring his own face until he dies" guy, right?

Ain't nobody told you to hurt me like that... Right in the feels man...

Depends on the bear for me. Black bear? I'll take that over a man any day (am a man). Polar bear? Yeah, no. I don't want to be within 1000 miles of a polar bear. Grizzley? Haven't decided, probably leaning towards wanting the bear, unless it actively hates me for some reason

Touche

TIL that image isn't the opening of a porn

I don't know anything about Archer (what was his destiny thing?), but I like what they've done with Pike. His knowing how he's going to die (more or less) doesn't change his competency as a captain, imo, just gives him some pretty good personal issues to grapple with, in a pretty Trekkie way.

Couple things.

1. I don't think that the whites-in-blacks worked as servants when there wasn't an active target on premises. They just wanted to stay around (since they live there, and want to be around family), but needed a reason to be there. The other white-in-black was just a regular dude, right? Until he got flashed?
2. I don't think they were racist in the sense of "black people are inferior", but more "black people are exotic". Post full-on-racism there has been a rising objectification of black people, in the vein of "once you go black, you never go back" that is dehumanizing of black people in a subtler way than southern belle racism.

I think that only applies if you can make an argument that the two characters are distinct. Your Mickey/Steamboat Willie example is good because they are distinct (slightly different looks, and different names). Another good example is Sherlock Holmes. There was a big lawsuit where the current rights holders tried to argue that the later works are still under copyright just because Sherlock has emotions, and he didn't in the earlier stories. I don't remember how the suit turned out though.

In the context of the article, they're talking about the fact that news outlets aren't getting enough ad revenue to sustain themselves, and people don't really buy classifieds in papers anymore.

The Milky Way is spinning. It's spinning wrong based on the stuff we see. So, scientists think there must be stuff we can't see making it spin that way. Some scientists have drawn a picture of what it would look like if we could see the stuff.

In Unix shell scripts 1 is false, so there's that