Not really, you can make "strong" coffee using any method.
I'm asking about the overall quality. On a scale of swill-drinker to intolerable-coffee-snob, who uses pour over ?
DogMuffins
joined 1 year ago
Don't you need their filters also ?
Pour over doesn't seem that popular in Australia. I mean I know it's a thing but I've never seen it or heard of anyone drinking it.
Here the at-home-coffee options go instant > french press > mocha pot > pods > espresso machine.
Where would pour over fit in here?
I hadn't heard of this. Looks like they're using sugar to make that thick consistency. One recipe says 1tbsp coffee 1tbsp sugar 1tbsp hot water. That's a hard no from me.
You do you I guess but... surely a good cup of proper coffee tastes less-shit and has more caffeine?
Can you elaborate ?
It's supposed to be pressurised hot water through grinds, like espresso.
Out of curiosity, can I ask what it was that made mastodon click?
I had two or three goes before realising that choosing the right instance can give you an engaging "local" feed. That seems dramatically less important on lemmy though.
No one is going to avoid implementing it - even if it were technically feasible.
Imagine a browser that couldn't be used for YouTube, Gmail, Facebook, et cetera.
Brave is a bit of a wild-card I guess. Their model is basically non-viable with this change. They're fucked either way.
It's cool footage but I don't think that much of an anomaly.
This always happens to same extent when a tree is blown over.
Does anyone actually use crypto to make actual purchases though?
Yeah releases > assets
Just say no thanks. No need to tell them that it's a life long choice.