DokPsy

joined 1 year ago
[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Win +shift+s to get snapshots

Win +r to get to run command, generally for opening applications in safe mode

Win to quickly start search for apps or settings

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago

It at least rings the doorbell

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey now. We've also got goats and fish.

And really ticked off blue voters watching the same Trump fondlers get elected over and over again

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Defunding of women's health programs such as planned parenthood started long before the actual ban

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

100% wfh is hard to beat when looking at new positions. I'd have to at least double my income for me to go into the office

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The biggest differences are that the interest rate is so jacked up, there's no actual end date for the loan, and there's little regard to the person's ability to pay the loan back when getting it.

They're more akin to sub prime mortgages than regular mortgages or auto loans in that last respect which were insanely predatory

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Most of these loans are interest paying first. Which means the principle (which the interest is being calculated from) doesn't go down. No other major loan is this fucked.

You get a car loan or mortgage, it's set up so that you pay it off in X number years.

Good luck finding a student loan that you could do that with, especially when 75+% of your income goes to rent.

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

And entirely on brand

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If he does, great. He can't interrupt or defend any questions. Let the back and forth go through as normal with emphasis on the quiet that would be Trump's responses

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Damn, I knew I was forgetting one. Lol

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Again when is that book appropriate? Restricting a book when they can easily get a copy online or find worse fanfiction is just silly to me.

If they want to read something I don't want them to for whatever reason, making it forbidden is a good way to make sure they read it, especially for teenagers.

Back to the main point of this thread, book banning is not doing the kids any favors and only serves to restrict thinking and learning. Even bad twilight fanfiction can serve as an example of what shouldn't happen.

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It's not even very good softcore porn. Tell me, at what age is reading about people having sex where one of the two uses their power and money to trick the other into thinking that they're loved and not just some playboys breathing sex doll appropriate?

Edit: monitor? Yes. Actively discuss about? If they want to. If fifty shades interests them even after talking over what it's about, that's fine. They're allowed to make mistakes to learn from. Our jobs as parents are to teach them and to help them figure out who they are, not hide them away from society and keep them in ignorance as long as possible.

view more: next ›