Doombot1

joined 1 year ago
[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

Just note that if you 3D print something, if you use the wrong material, there’s a chance it may melt.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s actually a surprisingly powerful SBC for what it costs. Does Pine64 stuff come with fancy looking enclosures like that one, too?

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

I would heavily suggest not doing this. HDDs are significantly more reliable than flash storage when it comes to long-term, power-off data retention. Period. There’s a relatively little-known fact about SSDs and flash storage where they aren’t actually rated to sit around with data on them for all that long. The voltages stored inside of them degrade and the data is slowly lost over time if they aren’t powered on. The enterprise SSDs that I work on are rated for 3 months - as in, set it on a shelf for three months, and after that, if you don’t power it on, it isn’t guaranteed that all of your data will still be there. And this is talking about ultra-redundant, enterprise SAS SSDs. MicroSDs don’t have any of that redundancy. (And yes - this implies that setting a bunch of important flash drives in a safe for ten years is not a great idea. That is true! It’s unlikely that you will experience data loss, but it’s more likely than with an HDD)

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Just back them up in multiple places. I’d suggest Backblaze for offsite storage; I use it to back up my important data.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

A plain old samba share works just fine, I’ve got a few running at home.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what’s wrong with medium? (Serious question)

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

The Crucial option is good because of more upgrade ability in the future. But - here’s another idea, that’s right around $100 but will be even smaller & more portable: Drive like this one: https://a.co/d/2dnQ1w1 With an adapter like this one: https://a.co/d/eiYVTvu

That said, I think your crucial SSD+enclosure would work just fine. I’ve got one of the m.2 adapters above and it’s a handy little thing so I know that works, too.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

We need more info about the drive. Is it new? If so, absolutely RMA it. Just isn’t worth the headache even if the self test reports fine. If not new, how many hours? Reads? Writes? Any failures reported by SMART? Et cetera.

The more info, the better. I work in SSD failure analysis/firmware development.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

The pins are called “DuPont connectors” - you’d want to chop the LED-side and use a 3 pin female DuPont instead of a 2 pin. If this is something you think you’ll do more than once, I’d buy a crimper on Amazon or wherever (they’re ~$25 last time I checked). But, you could also pull the two wires out of the connector and keep the crimps on them, and then just stick them into the DuPont plastic shell which would avoid needing a new pair of crimpers. To remove them, there’s usually a little tiny plastic tab on one side for each contact that you can pry up with a little tiny screwdriver.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great explanation. Yes - I’ve done this before! Built up a system with a RAID array but then realized I wanted a different boot drive. Didn’t really want to wait for dual 15Tb arrays to rebuild - and luckily for me, I didn’t have to! Because the metadata is saved on the discs themselves. If I had to guess (I could be wrong though) - I believe ‘sudo mdadm —scan —examine’ should probably bring up some info about the discs, or something similar to that command.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it a hardware raid or a software raid? If it’s software (not sure abt hardware), the discs themselves should have the array’s metadata on it, and you can just use mdraid & restart the array.

[–] Doombot1@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, what…? My shower uses ~2.5 gallons per minute, and at a cost of $2.55/thousand gallons where I live, that’s a total of ~$0.003 (a third of a cent) to turn it off for 30 seconds while I soap

view more: next ›