The calculations required to even something simple as '2+2' on a NN are exponentially greater than what's required to do it directly on the CPU.
Even if a completely new method to use NN's is found that uses a thousand times fewer cycles than it currently does, it'd still be orders of magnitudes more.
No.
The calculations required to even something simple as '2+2' on a NN are exponentially greater than what's required to do it directly on the CPU.
Even if a completely new method to use NN's is found that uses a thousand times fewer cycles than it currently does, it'd still be orders of magnitudes more.