Dragonstaff

AI cannot be relied upon to follow its own rules, prompt injection or no.

https://fortune.com/2025/09/02/ai-openai-chatgpt-llm-research-persuasion/

I don't think there's any speculation that it's real. The question is whether it was created with AI and/or edited.

Yes, absolutely.

My fear is whether Americans will choose socialism right now. I'm in a very queer, anarchist bubble and I'm not sure how to tell how popular this sort of thought is.

My concern is how thoroughly Americans have rooted socialists out of power and how all of our media will insist that we need more fascism, not less.

There's no question. Chatbots are implicated in a lot of suicides, shattering the first rule.

There could be an interesting conversation about whether the environmental impact ALSO breaks the first rule, but that conversation is unnecessary when chat bots are telling kids to kill themselves.

I think you're correct. But if so, that means a lot of people are going to die and even after they die, we have no guarantee that the next power structure will be any better.

shrug

This is why this completely unsupported graphic on the internet seems unreliable to me. If you want to quibble about WHY one shouldn't believe a completely unsupported graphic on the internet...okay.

Do you think that someone should believe a graphic on the internet without verifying the information from a reputable source?

It feels like they tanked the test out of spite. I'm curious about the methodology of the study, but France has far too much tourism to believe this without seeing the underlying data.

It didn't occur to me that the people in the graphic might be women. 😆

Respecting people is way more important than "getting" a meme, so your head's in the right place, regardless.

The major difference is that one is happening and the other is a fever dream from the perpetrators of the first.

"In theory"? More like "Move fast and break society."