Drewelite

joined 1 year ago
[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 3 months ago

Well it sounds like they're doing something to make their products better, you just disagree that it's going to be successful.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 3 months ago

Why are liberals being so negative about Kamala's progress? I get that we need people to not be complacent and go vote. But feeling like it's hopeless is just as good as getting people to stay at home. We need to celebrate the support if we want to keep it, you know.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Why won't women just accept that men should be in charge?!"

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

Why are all these comments making me love this design? 😂

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I've known some workaholics, And they can be pretty oblivious to everything that isn't in the lane of their work life. Their own health, already born children, basic life stuff, etc.. Also stress induced amenorrhea is a thing .

This psycho should absolutely go to prison. But it's possible she's at least being honest.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

That's the goal ain't it? Imma need y'all's help.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They won't need maintenance if they're a general purpose intelligence. A technology that has the possibility to free all of humanity from scarcity, has the possibility to finally collapse dominance of aristocracy for good. Sure, they'll try and put themselves on top somehow. But once the knowledge exists, anyone can create a version for the greater good.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 4 months ago

That's the cool part, you won't. If everything crucial is automated, people can drive things forward for passion rather than for money. Of course, this would effectively collapse capitalism, which won't happen painlessly.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well wouldn't SCOTUS not accept the changes until they deem them valid? (which they won't)

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

Ron DeSantis already tried. He only failed because Trump is still around. The GOP learned that they need to wait for him to leave the scene before they try again.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He's the only one because he's still around. If he died yesterday we'd have someone new leading the charge by election time.

You've specifically pointed out ideologies that weren't allowed to die because of how oppressed they were. I'm not suggesting we shouldn't have fought the Nazis, but victory inherently creates an oppressed underdog that people love to rally around.

The ideologies that die are the ones that fail on their own and people lose faith in. Think monarchies, feudalism, mercantilism, the OG version of Communism, colonialism, etc.. So ideally we won't want to use force if at all possible. Let them lose election after election until they realize they've alienated too many people to ever be successful.

view more: ‹ prev next ›