DriftingDeep

joined 1 year ago
[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago

There’s literally a section in this article titled “Anecdotes shape perception.” In the event you were being serious, try reading the article, since it specifically addresses your point.

[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it not? There are 2 ways I could’ve intended. There’s the serious use, where I think the joke is actually (unironically) funny, or there’s ironic use, where I don’t think the joke itself is funny, but the use of something generally agreed upon as unfunny is itself its own joke.

I’m genuinely not trying to be overly pedantic here, and I may not be funny, but I’m fairly certain my use of “irony” was correct.

[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My bad. Poor attempt at irony.

[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s a random selection of judges now. There are 19 judges, and the computer assigns the case at random now that the indictment has been handed in. Worst game of Russian roulette.

[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Worth noting, in Georgia, neither can the Governor. It’s a secret pardon committee who does that, and that’s ONLY after a certain period of time has been served.

Ol’ Kemp can’t bail Trump out of this one.