DylanMc6

joined 1 week ago
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

i had to take that leftvalues quiz again for this comment:

Q: Some small scale destruction of nature is acceptable if it notably benefits humanity.

A: don't destroy nature, please - disagree.

Q: Foreign officials have no right to dictate policy in another country.

A: i think they should - strongly disagree.

Q: 'Socialist organizations are generally better off when organized loosely and decentrally.'

A: maybe, maybe not - neutral/unsure.

Q: Revolutionary violence is acceptable as long as the final outcome is positive.

A: i think government reforms should be necessary for the switch to socialism, but if the government tries to suppress it, we might as well reluctantly use force in a revolution - neutral/unsure.

Q: Mass spontaneous actions are more effective than carefully planned actions.

A: i think actions should be planned - neutral/unsure.

Q: Nationalism and patriotism are impulses that are unacceptable in a socialist society.”

A: you can be socialist AND support your country - neutral/unsure

Q: Revolution is the best way of achieving a socialist society.

A: ...if the government tries to suppresses socialist reforms - agree.

Q: Measures to address environmental issues are unacceptable if they result in significant decreases in production and quality of life.

A: no comment - neutral/unsure.


here are my results - still got 'centrist marxism':

basically:

revolution vs. reform: NOT anti-revolution, but i support reform (with revolution being an option for when the government suppresses socialist reforms) - leaning towards reformism. shoutout to eduard bernstein.

scientific or utopian?: scientific, probably

central vs. decentral: who cares? everyone just want a say in the government

international or national: very internationalist

party or union?: still both!

production or nature: leaning towards ecology

progressive or conservative: progressive


oh and what meds were you taking, and is there any reason why?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago (4 children)

can you explain?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i would, but i CAN'T go outside without permission - i'd help with the organizing, but i will NOT attend the protest, sorry. seriously!

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

vivian wilson (elon's daughter) should start her own social media site just to watch her father squirm, and people will go it a lot more than twixter.

if this were a socialist country, elon musk would've been in jail. seriously!

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

at this point, we must all reluctantly use force to stop oligarchs around the world. seriously!

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

have you used bitview?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (11 children)

can we organize?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

can we use force?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

we need a revolution. seriously!

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago

why AREN'T you saying the f-word uncensored? are you a mormon?

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

if only someone stopped him from falling over...

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 days ago (10 children)

if a socialist country has multiple parties that DOESN'T have any way of competing, what would it be like?

also, can a socialist country have like-minded parties that "support the socialist order", but regardless competes with each other (as their ideologies are in the socialist spectrum)?

view more: ‹ prev next ›