EldritchFeminity

joined 2 years ago
[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Socialism was also popular at the time and they were using that to increase their appeal.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the "used intelligently and responsibly" part is why people dislike AI - they don't trust companies or people to use it that way (and for good reason based on the results so far).

Plus, it's not gonna put everything back into Pandora's Box. What we're in is a societal and cultural arms race where AI is just another escalation that's being used by both sides.

Also, resistance to air pollution isn’t as crucial as it once was due to better emissions technologies.

Tell that to the recently defunded EPA...

Everyone who disagrees with you is a bot, probably from Russia. You are very smart.

Where did they say that? They just said bots in general. It's well known that Russia has been running a propaganda campaign across social media platforms since at least the 2016 elections (just like the US is doing on Russian and Chinese social media, I'm sure. They do it on Americans as well. We're probably the most propangandized country on the planet), but there's plenty of incentive for corpo bots to be running their own campaigns as well.

Or are you projecting for some reason? What do you get from defending Putin?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They have very long necks. The rest of it is still standing in the lobby, where a nice old lady with poor eyesight is telling one of its legs about her grandson.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My guess is that it's a step towards banning anything considered "sexual" or "deviant." I.e., anything to do with LGBTQ people, sex ed, educating women about their bodies and rights, etc. Anything that the white patriarchy dislikes while also making it easier to subjugate the population through ignorance and propaganda.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because Bluesky is centralised.

You say that like that isn't exactly what the majority of people want. When I first left Reddit, I was trying to explain Lemmy and federated services to some friends and one of them immediately replied with "why would you want that?" And this was from a guy who owned and operated his own TeamSpeak server just for his friends to use.

The average person wants a service that's easy to use first and foremost, and that is always going to be easier to do with a big centralized one owned and operated by a large company. They just want to be able to make an account and connect with friends and content. They don't care about things like privacy until it actively harms them.

The short of it is that he was an entry point for the MAGA pipeline years back. I don't know if he still schills for white supremacist podcasts and the like anymore, though.

I mean, he did a little more than "one too many Nazi jokes." Including, but not limited to, supporting white supremacists and advertising their social media and books on his channel and social media platforms.

The number of people that I've heard (especially teenagers) arguing that "it's normal over there" was honestly disheartening. He was a major component of the MAGA pipeline in the years leading up to Trump's first presidency.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's funny seeing other Massholes in here with all too similar experiences. I was literally just describing in another post an experience I had with a coworker the other week ranting in circles for 2 hours straight about how rational and centrist he is while spewing Fox News nonsense about "basic biology" and talking about how liberals never back their arguments up with facts and logic (unlike the Republican grifters he sees online, because they'd clearly never edit their videos to only make themselves look good).

Just because Mass benefits from being one of the most liberal states and 80% of Boston has a college degree doesn't mean that their shit don't stink.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is like the defining case of "just because it's legal doesn't make it okay." An 18 year old and a 16 year old is one thing. It's very different when it's a 30-something year old and a 16 year old. That's like a high school senior trying to get with a 12 year old.

There's a massive power imbalance in a relationship like that where the 30-something has basically total control. Even a 30-something with a college kid has issues imo, let alone a kid who's a sophomore or junior in high school. That's some Quamire from Family Guy shit. "I love high school girls. I get older, they stay the same age."

Half your age plus seven is the rule of thumb that I've heard. At 18, that means the lowest you should be dating is 16. At 32, it's 23. Etc.

Also, echo chambers are good, actually, and you can't change my mind. Life isn't supposed to be a constant argument, and the criticism of surrounding yourself with people who generally agree with you is a tactic that's been used to prevent people from simply cutting toxicity out on social media platforms.

view more: ‹ prev next ›