EngineerGaming

Yeah, that would be less worrisome, hope this really is the case here.

I thought that was because everyone just bought $3 off-brand ones on Amazon.

I did buy a pair of wireless headphones, but the earbuds are staying wired. The headphones have a large, easy-to-replace battery that lasts a couple of weeks easily - while earbuds don't. Some people might be inconvenienced by having to charge another device. Plus, Bluetooth doesn't have the same audio quality - not as important for me, but might be for some people.

That's just my association with the word "ban" - blocking, because that's what I usually experienced.

It is the free, easy way to get an SSL cert (plus automated renewals). Without it, maybe HTTPS wouldn't have been so omnipresent.

Yes, that was exactly my point. You would not treat any mail service like they would cover you during your unprotected use, and Proton is not an exception. So I don't understand why people are taking issue with them cooperating with LE - but I take issue with some other qualities.

I guess the issue here is overselling the safety of the service. Wouldn't rely on them encrypting the mail for you, for example. It's probably fine if you treat it just like you would any other email service - assuming you're fine with being unable to use a mail client at all on the free plan and using it in a weird roundabout way on the paid plans.

Here quite a few of the popular social media are banned. They're still popular but now every schoolkid, housewife and grandpa knows what a VPN is. Every time I hear such news, I am afraid of crackdowns on censorship evasion in those places too...

I don't see how most men would even find that out. Underwear is too intimate of a topic to open up about to the opposite sex.

Shoes are the most obnoxious things to shop for. Buying what you know makes total sense.

Yes, I am aware of such technology - they announced similar capabilities in our existing surveillance system. I know that it is most likely not as advanced as China's, because that's how it usually is here. However, it is not clear just how good it is in practice - at least in some cases, they've been overselling it (at least in regards to recognizing obstructed faces). So I am not sure just how dangerously accurate said gait recognition is, especially since they have much better facial recognition to depend on.

Yeah, but I don't see the point of driving here at all.