EngineerGaming

I don't think that whether it has a privacy impact even matters. What matters is how it demonstrates Mozilla's attitude towards user consent.

But the JS is served to the browser each time the page loads, you can't be sure it stays the same between loads. Sure, this is the same problem as malicious updates, but still exaggerated - the opportunity to slip in altered code is "every time you open the page" rather than "every update". Plus much more convenient to do targeting.

I would rather not use KYC even for low-sensitivity transactions. Because I am afraid of such sensitive info leaking. Sure, I do KYC for things like phone service already - but would avoid it at any cost where it can be done.

Maybe it is just me being the wrong generation, but I don't understand this meme. So Llama I guess is in relation to the company that owns the software - is that a consequence of animosity towards the parent company?

I wonder if this would be on all international devices and not just on the Chinese local ones.

Although indeed not getting one again, as apparently unlocking the bootloader is either hard or impossible.

From what I've seen, there are some blobs. At least Telegram-FOSS says:

Several proprietary parts were removed from the original Telegram client, including Google Play Services for the location services, HockeySDK for self-updates and push notifications through Google Cloud Messaging. Location sharing functionality is restored using OpenStreetMap.

Same page is where I learned you cannot register from third-party clients btw. Not nearly as big of a blow as removal of desktop registration, but still gross that you'd have to touch a partially-proprietary official app first.

Desktop client does not even have e2e, lol. (I don't know if there are third-party options that do).

Yeah, if I am not mistaken, this has happened in Iran - the registration confirmation messages just wouldn't arrive.

It asked for your phone number? That is the thing that angered me the most. I wonder why you would share this rather than ask a waiter and say you don't have Whatsapp, for example.

You would at least be able to examine the link first.

I am mostly concerned about potentially needing specific Big Tech implementations for them in some way... I don't mind using, say, KeepassXC for it, because it is independent from any account or hardware, as well as easily backupable. But NOT anything tied to a Google or MS account.

Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but Paypal says it restricts what passkeys can be used, so it is apparently possible:

Passkeys are currently available for eligible personal accounts. An eligible Apple or Android device is required to create a passkey.

Yeah, I fully agree! Point was different though... How does it relate to your statement of "there is no privacy on the internet"? Such awareness might help gain said privacy in each area, from different threats.