EnsignWashout

joined 2 years ago
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Archie is an idiot, here.

BecauseThat's a two player race set. He could have saved a dollar, and gotten to trash that kid in a race.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes. And the awkward social situation is when they ask what I'm wearing, but I didn't pay any attention to the brand of the urinal mat.

I don't want that to happen again, so now I'm careful to take note of the urinal mat branding.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I always figured the ending was to get the episode to air at all during the era. Like it wasn't obviously pro-tranistion, because no official protagonist transitioned or loved someone who did. :(

I'm thankful that Trek has managed stronger message with actual protagonists, since.

Of course, it must have also been to ensure the sacred expectations of television networks that episodes can air in any order because nothing meaningful changes.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Except there's no non-wildcard Republican candidate.

They've cracked the formula for telling their voter base that this time will be different and anti-establishment.

While the Democrats have solved for how to exhaust their voter base patience. (Bombing innocent people in other countries.)

Approval based voting is the only way the Democratic party remains a player in American politics.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How does this compare to first past the post? Does it make any difference in outcomes?

Yes. It may be the only chance American Democrats have of winning any future elections.

The next wildcard candidate will attract a bunch of votes, while a Democrat who stands for shitty compeomises could still get a "better than the other asshole" approval vote.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tagging is essentially the same as removing and not a compromise in my book.

Come check out Mastodon sometime, where we also tag movie spoilers, politics, mentions of any medical condition, and eye contact.

There's nothing wrong with eye contact. It makes some people really uncomfortable. So we tag it so that they can filter it.

I wish I could upvote this twice! I'm actually on my way around to my second re-read of "Small Gods" during another full Discworld read-through.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Yea. Any religion that believes in a just interving diety runs into this.

If i really believe my god is perfect and all powerful, then why should I have compassion for all the unlucky people that god clearly despises?

It's hard, because the idea of a perfect loving god is incredibly attractive.

It's the evidence that sucks: if god is real and all powerful, then god is, at best ineffable, and at worst a terrible raging asshole who lovingly created a parasite that eats childrens eyes.

Now, if we're willing to believe in a sort of weak impotent god, the theology gets more interesting.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

why would I want this type of thing done at the community level?

I have an RSS feed for my unfiltered comics.

I read here for the community.

I'm happy to just skip the work of bigots, and have mostly blocked the users who routinely post that stuff.

That saif, if we're going to remove credit with intent, i have a request:

let's be clear and cedit "some random bigot", so I'll know i might not want to seek out the artist.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even while aware of how little classic scifi or fsntasy covers usually have in common with the book contents... This is still surprisingly weird.

view more: next ›