I'm loving starfield and I'll agree with this. It's a mid eighties score kind of game. If it's what you want it's amazing, but the people calling it game of the century and whatnot are buying their own hype.
On the other hand, it's likely to have serious staying power as an all time classic game, Bethesda is great at that and there's a ton of room for people to use it as an incredible mod canvas. I don't think that should affect launch reviews though.
I'm not a fan of Bethesda's reliance on mods to do basic shit, like fix a broken UI and inventory management system, by honestly I also think this argument is overused. People pay for these games because they want to mod the shit out of them, it's like ninety percent of the appeal. Nobody is forcing modders to work on them, either. That argument can only stretch so far. For comparison, No Man's Sky is actively hostile to modding, and as a result I probably won't be going back to it despite loving it. They're not going to add the kind of content I want, they're likely never going to, and they're not letting anyone else do it either. I wish they'd allow free volunteers to finish off some of their 75%-of-the-way-to-greatness features.
With starfield, I'm excited for the mods, and the game is far from flawless goodness knows, but I've had a friggin good time and definitely got my money's worth on vanilla. Now I look forward to spicing it as I like.
The upper whites thing has led to some of the funniest memes I've seen in ages, not gonna complain about that one.
I miss forums so much. A federated backend for forums would be nice. I'm so tired of having these giant communities of angry strangers if I want to talk about anything
It's perfectly reasonable to wait. Games only gonna get better.
I'd try not to read too much into the internet fuss. It's a better release than Bethesda's usual in most regards. I wound up sinking almost the entire weekend into it, haven't done that in ages. The games really fun. That said, it is only going to get better with time.
!dda_discussion@cdda.social - we've got a micro-instance for our ultra-nichd foss roguelike, cataclysm: dark days ahead.
I'm not sure. It's a good game, but the fun you can have in it is more Minecraft style than Bethesda style. If you want that, then it's probably worth a try
Yeah. I'm agreeing with you I think, but my main gripe here is that even in the intro/tutorial moments they don't actually tutorial anything.
I don't mind the mechanic of the double unlock. I do think a lot of the unlocks themselves are phoned in. Was just ranting about how bad the "install 15 unique ship parts" one is with a friend, like why not something kind of interesting instead of such a grindy one? "Make a ship with only one engine and a top speed of 150" eg.
the system is interesting. The gameplay is meh, but I don't think it'd be too bad if there was something tied to it.
personally I prefer finding the obelisks as a way to learn languages. I forgot about the cookie cutter, useless NPCs in the stations.
imo the main problem isn't that there are a lot of things, it's a major lack of information about game systems really. The game gives you a boostpack and tells you it'll help, but doesn't bother to pop up and tell you you'll need a point in boosters if you want to use it. It shows you how to target enemy engines but doesn't tell you you'll need a point in targeting if you want to do it yourself. It's an obvious, silly miss. I don't mind that these things need points, but it's annoying that it doesn't tell you, especially when they have a place in the game where they easily could.
Lots of places really. Outside the tutorial sections of the main quest, why not have my boost packs say like "basic boost pack - function locked unless you have Boosters 1"
They've already killed people.