EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted

joined 1 year ago

…you big stinky poo poo face!

Well then damn it all; what more evidence do you need?!

The poo-pooing alone is a court-martial offence!

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Friendly reminder: many people on Lemmy, let alone the Fediverse as a whole, are not American.

With that being said, no, no, I haven't voted. But I plan to on Election Day! :)

Down with fascism! °o°i

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thanks so much to you and @FizzyOrange@programming.dev for helping! This has been driving me crazy for like 3-4 weeks now! >_<

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Ohhhhh! I think I get it now!

So == means "equals" and is a declaration of the state of things, while = means "assigned the value of` and is a command toward a certain state of things. A description vs an action. An observation of a thing as opposed to effecting that thing.

Is that about right?

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I apologize; I do not know what "metafont" is...

It would be confusing and weird if “=” did different things depending on the context.

That's why I'm confused! It seems like it does!

If I were to write the code

x = 20
print(x*2)

it would execute as 40.

But then the video turns around and says that == is equal to, not =.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

I think what I'm most confused about is I cannot for the life of me seem to wrap my head around the difference between "assignment" and "equality". They seem exactly the same to me: when a variable is assigned a value, it's equal to that value now.

Even if I were write the program

x = 20
print(x*2)

it would still print 40. Because x is equal to 20. Because it was assigned the value of 20.

Hell, I've even heard Dr. Severance say "equal to" in this context in earlier videos multiple times.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Twitter is the only time I will ever be okay with deadnaming.

Ah, fair enough. Lol. I was hoping you were making a Fallout: New Vegas reference. Haha.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ave, true to Caesar.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, it saddens me greatly to see how far Reddit had degraded. It was an amazing place back then. Then, again, I suppose the whole Web has changed. It's much more compartmentalized now, and even worse, much more corporatized. Walled gardens, echo chambers, the whole nine yards.

Yes, there were echo chambers even back then, but it wasn't as...well, I guess the word I would choose is "sanitized". It was free-er, whatever that word have meant. Honestly, I feel sad when I hear people say the Internet is magical. Because yes it can be from time to time, but they don't know or remember or care that it used to be so much MORE magical.

The Internet used to be Leeroy Jenkins; now's Leeroy's gone and it's just a rich executive in a suit trying to peddle the newest software as a service. :(

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This.

It's something that I had to learn, coming from Reddit, too, and is a difficult paradigm shift to process: the fact that there is no "Lemmy" more than there are, rather, "Lemmys".

Also, as a (now former) Reddit user for the longest time (>10 years), I daresay that the diversity of opinions is honestly more similar to how Reddit used to be, in terms of there being VASTLY different communities and therefore VASTLY different sets of beliefs from community to community. Reddit may be a lot more homogenized now, but back in, say, 2010? It was way more diverse. Closer to how Lemmy is now.

view more: ‹ prev next ›