You can see the reason cited.
In almost all cases you cannot see who did it.
Any conversation about it is, as a rule, private
You can see the reason cited.
In almost all cases you cannot see who did it.
Any conversation about it is, as a rule, private
Hey the mods removed my reply. I wonder what perfectly reasonable reason they'll cite.
Don't understand >> troll.
That's efficient
I heard about this big Christian from a hundred years ago who doubted the existence of time, space and physical objects. I like that guy.
Yeah, but once the power is there it will be used for less legit reasons, like removing "saying nice stuff about the wrong politician".
We're talking about removing stuff at the judgment of the presiding authority.
Rationale is infinitely flexible. It will never be science. So it cannot be relied upon.
So, ideals aside, consider it in that light. Be realistic.
You got a better one?
Well we have this upvoting/downvoting paradigm. Simple and popular. Maybe that could be developed further.
But sometimes you are wrong.
Refer to the replies of others here who are having less difficulty than you. Use the power of Lemmy.
Ha ha. What is the plan of this invisible deity?