there is a higher risk of it being trafficking than not.
Higher than not? You're totally making that up.
And buying drugs has a high risk of funding cartels and human trafficking. Doesn't make buying and using drugs immoral.
there is a higher risk of it being trafficking than not.
Higher than not? You're totally making that up.
And buying drugs has a high risk of funding cartels and human trafficking. Doesn't make buying and using drugs immoral.
Why would you leave this trash here?
Why not?
So all of them since that's a perfect score?
What's infuriating is the decision to do it, or that it even crossed someone's mind, or that people like you just defend whatever bullshit gets fed to you
There's only one instance dedicated to furry porn
So you don't care if it's true or not, you're just mentioning it because you associate insider trading with pelosi for just random unrelated reasons?
So, he exercised his options he held for quite a while, a "week before House panel considered antitrust bills". What exactly was the insider information? And, he just exercised the options to hold the stock. Not sure how that's evidence of insider trading
Lol wtf is this shitty kind of thinking? The waiter who served you at the restaurant you last ate could be a victim of human trafficking too.
If he knew they were trafficked, then sure, arrest him and charge him. Otherwise, he's no more guilty of anything immoral than you were eating at the last restaurant you went to