Farmdude

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I can tell have this way about you. It's so on the money. Your money

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I was just gaining insights. Thanks

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Futher context. It's an alternative to the standard model that seems to fit the planke data with two fewer parameters. This would need to be validated by numerous cosmologists, I would suppose. The cosmologists eho downloaded it does publish papers regarding alternatives to DM and DE. Some similarities, but the independent researcher has a vastly different model to the standard. It's a fresh hypothesis. Not a tweak. By reading the cosmologists papers, I would wager it's fits his work. The missing structure of it all. Or it's nothing.

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It cause severe mental stuff as well. I'm convinced.

 

So, if an academic paper is published in an open journal by an average citizen with an obsession for learning from online sources. So, there are no credentials but a decent work history. A prestigious college downloads the paper. What are the possible reasons?

 

So, if an academic paper is published in an open journal by an average citizen with an obsession for learning from online sources. So, there are no credentials but a decent work history. A prestigious college downloads the paper. What are the possible reasons?

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's rad, dude. I wish I knew how to do that. Hey, dude I imagined a cosmological model that fits the data with two fewer parameters then the standard model. Planke data. I I've checked the numbers, but I don't have the credentials. I need somebody to check it out. This is a it and a verbal explanation for the model by Academia.edu. It's way easier to listen first before looking. I don't want recognition or anything. Just for someone to review it. It's a short paper. https://youtu.be/_l8SHVeua1Y

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes. I was aware of that, but I was manipulated by an analog device

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I NEED TO consult every LLM VIA TELEKINESIS QUANTUM ELECTRIC GRAVITY A AND B WAVE.

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think the best thing at this juncture is to ask an LLM WHAT THE TRUTH IS LOL

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll ask AI what's really going on lolool.

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did dozens of times. Same calculations.

[–] Farmdude@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm a little confused after listening to a podcast with.... Damn I can't remember his name. He's English. They call him the godfather of AI. A pioneer.

Well, he believes that gpt 2-4 were major breakthroughs in artificial infection. He specifically said chat gpt is intelligent. That some type of reasoning is taking place. The end of humanity could come in a year to 50 years away. If the fella who imagined a Neural net that is mapped using the human brain. And this man says it is doing much more. Who should I listen too?. He didn't say hidden AI. HE SAID CHAT GPT. HONESTLY ON OFFENSE. I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS EPIC SCENARIO ON ONE SIDE AND TOTALLY NOTHING ON THE OTHER

 

Ok, you have a moderately complex math problem you needed to solve. You gave the problem to 6 LLMS all paid versions. All 6 get the same numbers. Would you trust the answer?

view more: next ›