“perfection is the enemy of progress”, right?
Isn't there a difference between people starving when there isn't enough food and having more than enough food you allow to rot so a small percentage of people can live as kings?
You get how that is different, right?
How many people dying while there are resources to prevent their dying is too many?
Are unhoused people an acceptable sacrifice to Mammon in your view?
Why do you assume people arguing (correctly) against the evils of capitalism want to go back to say feudalism and not progress toward a just system that respects universal human dignity and does not require human suffering to grease the wheels of machinery which lines a tiny % of pockets?
Compared to pre industrial humans, we live better than kings, and we work probably more like half less than they had to.
And yet with more than enough food to feed everyone and 30 times as many vacant homes per unhoused person, people still starve and die of exposure on the streets.
it doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.
I could forward you some reading if you'd like to be less ignorant, though I have my doubts you desire to be.
You almost sound like an AI bot, am I talking with an AI bot?
If you can't tell it sounds like I've passed the Turing, at least.
What in the world has capitalism to do with this?
Nothing can be consensual under a system which privatizes the means of life and coerces behavior to attain access to natural resources everyone needs and no one made.
MAID can't be consensual under capitalism, but all beings which exist have an inherent right to end their own existence whenever they decide to.
This wouldn't be a discussion if a 27 year old shot themself, huffed an asphyxiant, or jumped off something high.
All you have to do is to tolerate that you can’t just call everyone nazi because they once had dinner with someone that might be a “nazi”
If you sat down and broke bread with someone who argued for killing all the Jews and Queers and you didn't punch them in the mouth for even thinking that what the fuck do you think that would make you?
You are abetting an act of violence to allow people to try to organize a genocide, and any stage of that organization.
If 100 people are in the same room as a nazi they are all Nazis…
I said "having dinner", but if a nazi shows up at your event and no one throws them out, that's a nazi event.
All you have to do is not tolerate nazis, my dude.
10 people having dinner with a nazi is 11 nazis.
Why do you keep arguing for tolerating people fomenting genocide?
No. That’s not how it works.
That's absolutely how it works; fascist shit said so himself:
“I was planning to go out tomorrow during the Women’s March to do some journalism but I can’t do that anymore,” Spencer told viewers.
Nazi gets protected by Somebody > Somebody turns Nazi> somebody is protected by someone else> someone else turns nazi and so on.
You're laying it out wrong.
Nazi gets popped in the mouth > everybody cheers
See how we short-circuited your "spiral"?
That looks like a cigarette.