FlexibleToast

joined 1 year ago
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Because the time frame that TNG takes place in. It was a peaceful era and the Galaxy Class ship was designed for prolonged exploration and ambassador missions. Due to the long periods in space the Federation designed the ship to accommodate families of the Starfleet officers. That's also why the ship could separate, the battle bridge could go into combat while the civilians stayed behind in the saucer section. With these long voyages and family aboard they thought it was important to include mental health being an importance, so important that Troi was a bridge officer.

Voyager was a smaller ship made purely for scientific research and wasn't supposed to be gone for so long. Also, after the discovery of the Borg, the Federation changed their ship designs to have more combat in mind.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, they could conduct a peaceful transfer of power without the congratulations. They would be ruthlessly mocked for being sore losers, but they would be internally consistent at least.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Exactly. His legacy is not doing what he promised, not being that bridge to the next generation. Only giving up his lust for being president when it was too late.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure this one will pass congressional approval. I could see it easily going in either direction.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rubio is probably the least controversial pick so far.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On the other hand I can see republican politicians pretending to be stunned in order to say one thing and do another. They get to pretend they don't like it for the political game and then actually support it.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

But really? Do we really have to implement learning programs for this shit or something?

Yes. Every time something new is introduced, people have to learn the new thing. Not everyone is as informed as you or I. Most people don't care that much and have never considered alternative voting techniques.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

It's the paradox of choice. With more options, people become more likely to not choose because it's overwhelming.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

And that people live in cities.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Florida would be the better option imo. During that time frame it won't be tourist season, so those beaches won't be over crowded either. Florida beaches get kind of nuts at spring break time. The flipside of that is that not everywhere will be open. I visited Destin in Feb before and some of the more tourist spots, like Shed BBQ for example, were closed.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Hawaii overall is nicer and more expensive than Florida, however Florida easily has the better beaches. Snorkeling is going to be better in Hawaii, but the beaches themselves are pretty rocky and kind of mid, to be honest. Florida knows its beaches are the money makers and goes the extra mile to make them nice. The sand is well groomed and it's that powdery white sand that feels incredible.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

The lesson is they shouldn't have abandoned the working class. Instead of listening to working class concerns, they told the working class they were wrong. For example, they waited way too long to care about immigration even after Bill Clinton tried to do something about it in the 90s.

view more: next ›