Flipper

I should have been more clear.

I meant for self hosting.

Though realistically, even if the service is provided for the public, you could just use an instance of keycloak or something similar with open registration. That's what an association I'm close to is doing already.

By default, the Credentials provider does not persist data in the database. However, you can still create and save any data in your database, you just have to provide the necessary logic, eg. to encrypt passwords, add rate-limiting, add password reset functionality, etc.

That is exactly the complexity I wouldn't want. With just SSO it is enough to send a redirect URL to the browser and on the callback set a cookie. No js needed. If your service gets compromised and someone leeks the credentials, just log everyone out.

If i created a service I would go in the opposit direction. Only offer SSO and no other option.

You loose quite a bit of complexity that way.

If anyone ist surprised by that they should look up why niantic was ever founded.

It was always about data collection in the real world.

I mean, if you really want to use a different language, there are macros that enable that for you. Here is the example for Rost. Just Rust, but in German.

His Video fehlt More like an ad.

I didn't know about that one.

You say you are on a budget. Yet you talk about 128 Gigs of ram.

Maybe you should clarify what your budget is.

You've got to reboot after kernel updates, otherwise it can't load new modules. I've been confused at least twice why something didn't load until.I remembered the reboot.

Im sorry, but what integrity are we talking oft?

Oh, yes it can. The license only changes what other people than the owner may do. It's the rights and conditions they give you.

For most projects that doesn't matter because there are several owners of the code base. Every single person who contributed can enforce these rights on their part. However, to contribute to Zed you have to sign a cla. Signing away all rights and ownership of your contribution. So they have all the rights and can do whatever they want.

They could close source everything tomorrow without any consequence and sell you a feature you made yourself.

The Problem with open source is, it relies on self exploitation. Most OS Dev don't get paid, so they've got to work another jib full time. This leads to a lot of burned out devs from their project and that is a real problem.

Before a project becomes self sufficient on donationa, it needs to become really big. Most projects simply never reach that scale.