Foni

joined 1 year ago
[–] Foni@lemm.ee 12 points 5 hours ago

He's going to Threads??? They have finally launched the metaverse and no one has told me anything??? I don't see any other rational reason to do something like that.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm not going to discuss it with you, because I'm not a doctor nor is it the issue, but the health authorities (at least the European ones) do not agree with your statement.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I think that financing a platform like this with premium subscriptions is illusory. I could be wrong but what are they going to offer as a premium?

I think it may be interesting to note that Spotify is closing its first green year in its history this year, for reference.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. You are in a situation of harassment and you believe that giving your data and delegating your security to a private company that responds to economic interests is a viable long-term solution.

There are things that one cannot argue against

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

I will count it as a victory when my government's communication channels with me are not private property. A government-owned Mastodon server for official accounts would be logical (the EU already has it even though it barely uses it)

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Well, I am not a systems engineer to answer your question, in any case smaller Hitlers equals Hitlers with less power. Dividing power is not the definitive solution to authoritarianism, but it usually helps a lot, especially if the agents are also competitive. "If you are too Hitler, I'll go to this other server that is a little less so" is a valid incentive to avoid the Hitlerization of the admins.

I don't think I've ever used the name Hitler so much.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ok, I haven't denied that, the tools are different (I don't even know Twitter's tools very well), I debate whether that is worth enough to accept that it is centralized. If over time they consider that something else is more profitable, they will change the moderation tools, have no doubt.

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok, if for you the API is the most important thing, go ahead, I'm worried about more companies doing "things" with my data, everyone has their priorities.

P.S. Unlike in BlueSky in Mastodon you can be 100% sure that the API will never be closed, in Bluesky it will depend on variable business interests

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Ok, you weren't able to find interesting things on mastodon, it's not mastodon's fault if you followed doctors who post complete articles, but in any case you'd rather sell your data than make the effort. Good for you that you have found your place

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok, if it's good for you I'm glad, maybe over time it will happen to you like vaping and you can completely switch to decentralized networks

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That is, you'd rather have an algorithm tell you what's fun or interesting than the ability to discover things organically. Ok, bluesky is your place

[–] Foni@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Are these details really that important? Is it really that difficult to manually block 50-100 users? I don't know, everything you are telling me are, at best, marginal improvements that do not justify selling all your personal data to a private company seeking profit from those data/contributions.

CC @JaymesRS@literature.cafe

 

I guess I'm not the only one that happens to this, I follow communities with the same theme in different instances, it's not unusual then to see the same link sent by the same person in both, not a crosspost, the same link sent separately. ¿Is there any, let's say, correct protocol on how to interact with this? You know, do I vote for both? One positive and the other I ignore? What if I want to comment? Do I make the same comment on both?

view more: next ›